Announcement thread discussion

Anything goes here OT stuff is OK too!
BUTTON_POST_REPLY
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Lee »

I'd say ever increasing for teams who've missed GP in previous years.
User avatar
foofnik
PostsCOLON 1572
JoinedCOLON Sun May 31, 2015 2:58 pm
LocationCOLON Long Island, New York

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by foofnik »

dave1959 wroteCOLON
koomzzz wroteCOLONwhats the thought process behind making the threshold 850?

As of Mar 5 NHL standings (last day of our regular season) the NHL had played 967 games (78.6%) of it's scheduled games.
http://dropyourgloves.com/Games/AnyDate ... 5&League=1


78.6% of 1100 is 864.6.

We rounded it down to a nice even 850.
Do you remember how 1100 came about?
User avatar
dave1959
PostsCOLON 5138
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:43 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by dave1959 »

1100 was before my time
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Matthew »

Is the 70-35 goalie games starts for both the max and min? I thought it was starts for the max, and just games for the min?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
koomzzz
PostsCOLON 1245
JoinedCOLON Wed May 25, 2016 2:15 pm
LocationCOLON Cleveland, OH

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by koomzzz »

dave1959 wroteCOLON
koomzzz wroteCOLONwhats the thought process behind making the threshold 850?

As of Mar 5 NHL standings (last day of our regular season) the NHL had played 967 games (78.6%) of it's scheduled games.
http://dropyourgloves.com/Games/AnyDate ... 5&League=1


78.6% of 1100 is 864.6.

We rounded it down to a nice even 850.
fair enough. i like the move to regular season only. 850 seems a bit low, it's like 40 GP/week. it'd be neat to see how many had less than 40 skater GP in a week this season. maybe i'll dig into it
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Matthew »

I believe every team made gp this season on the 850 model. The lowest was 856?

Every team should also make 1100 this season.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
foofnik
PostsCOLON 1572
JoinedCOLON Sun May 31, 2015 2:58 pm
LocationCOLON Long Island, New York

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by foofnik »

If anyone remembers how the 1100 number came about I'd be curious to the logic behind where it came from.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Matthew »

I wouldn't be surprised if it's because it's close to 75% of 18 roster spots x 82 games, but because 1107 isn't a clean number they rounded down slightly.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
timwebb1212
PostsCOLON 720
JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by timwebb1212 »

I like 850 as a minimum. ADHL has 950 and it's for sure too high (7 teams missed this season, including the defending champs). 850 is high enough you have to field a real team but not so low as to generate an over the top valuation of fringe NHLers
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

timwebb1212 wroteCOLONI like 850 as a minimum. ADHL has 950 and it's for sure too high (7 teams missed this season, including the defending champs). 850 is high enough you have to field a real team but not so low as to generate an over the top valuation of fringe NHLers
Lol! Just no. 850 is nothing to reach. I regularly dressed 2 and 3 empty roster spots and at times 5 and 6 due to injury and dressing a lot of kids that went up and down and will make 1100 comfortably. This new 850 number will be significantly easier to hit in the regular season. I don't think that this is something that is in the best interest of the league at all, but I'm guessing certain members of the cc will be happy about this. Will be ridiculously easy for rebuilders to tank and make it much easier for contenders to acquire nhl players because this will devalue nhlers even further.
Handsome&FairMike
PostsCOLON 4810
JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Handsome&FairMike »

Haven't done the math but isn't it very similar to the 1100 games after 5 additional weeks?
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by CasperX22 »

Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONHaven't done the math but isn't it very similar to the 1100 games after 5 additional weeks?
It's an average of approx 2 less gp per week, so no.
User avatar
Shoalzie
PostsCOLON 12673
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
LocationCOLON Portland, MI
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Shoalzie »

The number of weeks vary...give or take a week.

The way I looked at 1100 over a full season...it's the equivalent of 13 skaters playing 82 games and 14th skater that playing 34 games. You can realistically have 4 skaters that do absolutely nothing all season.

If our typical regular season is 21 weeks...850 over 21 weeks is just over 40.5 games a week. That's 2.25 games a week from each skater.

Bottom line, the minimum is supposed to be a number we all can reach...shouldn't take a lot of effort. If you don't reach it, we'll hammer ya.
DETROIT RED WINGS | ROSTER | FANTRAX
User avatar
foofnik
PostsCOLON 1572
JoinedCOLON Sun May 31, 2015 2:58 pm
LocationCOLON Long Island, New York

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by foofnik »

FWIW ADHL has 950 for regular season (most thought 1000 was OK but we dropped it a little anyway)

We felt 15 active skaters each week was a fair minimum number, full lineup is 18 skaters.

Each team gets through about 65 games by the time our regular season ends (same exact schedule and timing as in here)

15 x 65 = 975 so there's breathing room.

18 x 65 = 1170 so that leaves 220 GP for injuries and guys going up and down, that's over 10 GP each week in breathing room, that's 3 or 4 spots to fiddle with.
User avatar
dave1959
PostsCOLON 5138
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:43 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by dave1959 »

If we did 950:

Missed:
Carolina-862
Arizona-914
Anaheim-856
NYRangers-876
Dallas-918

Barely:
Vancouver-953
Colorado-965
User avatar
Fraser
PostsCOLON 3681
JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:38 am
LocationCOLON Perth, Western Australia

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Fraser »

dave1959 wroteCOLONIf we did 950:

Missed:
Carolina-862
Arizona-914
Anaheim-856
NYRangers-876
Dallas-918

Barely:
Vancouver-953
Colorado-965
BBKL cup champ. Penalized for not icing a competitive roster.
Image
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by Matthew »

CasperX22 wroteCOLON
Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONHaven't done the math but isn't it very similar to the 1100 games after 5 additional weeks?
It's an average of approx 2 less gp per week, so no.
Nope, we used a ratio. Then moved it down a bit for a clean number. The exact ratio between 1100 was 864 I believe, and we moved it down to 850. So it's more like a .75gp per roster position over the entire season. Which is less, yes, but definitely not 2 per roster spot.

In fact, my own team was 856 at the end of the season, and will be further past 1100 as my team has been healthier lately. Probably around 1130.

And fwiw, I assume you are pointing at Arian and I as the certain People of the cc,and originally neither of us wanted the 850 number.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
timwebb1212
PostsCOLON 720
JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by timwebb1212 »

foofnik wroteCOLONFWIW ADHL has 950 for regular season (most thought 1000 was OK but we dropped it a little anyway)

We felt 15 active skaters each week was a fair minimum number, full lineup is 18 skaters.

Each team gets through about 65 games by the time our regular season ends (same exact schedule and timing as in here)

15 x 65 = 975 so there's breathing room.

18 x 65 = 1170 so that leaves 220 GP for injuries and guys going up and down, that's over 10 GP each week in breathing room, that's 3 or 4 spots to fiddle with.
And 25% of the league missed GP, including the defending champ.

A minimum should be something easy to reach, not something that any team rebuilding has to sweat out all season and make like 10 trades killing their prospect depth in a desperate attempt to acquire NHL players
User avatar
dave1959
PostsCOLON 5138
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:43 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by dave1959 »

timwebb1212 wroteCOLON
foofnik wroteCOLONFWIW ADHL has 950 for regular season (most thought 1000 was OK but we dropped it a little anyway)

We felt 15 active skaters each week was a fair minimum number, full lineup is 18 skaters.

Each team gets through about 65 games by the time our regular season ends (same exact schedule and timing as in here)

15 x 65 = 975 so there's breathing room.

18 x 65 = 1170 so that leaves 220 GP for injuries and guys going up and down, that's over 10 GP each week in breathing room, that's 3 or 4 spots to fiddle with.
And 25% of the league missed GP, including the defending champ.

A minimum should be something easy to reach, not something that any team rebuilding has to sweat out all season and make like 10 trades killing their prospect depth in a desperate attempt to acquire NHL players
hear hear!!
User avatar
koomzzz
PostsCOLON 1245
JoinedCOLON Wed May 25, 2016 2:15 pm
LocationCOLON Cleveland, OH

Re: Announcement thread discussion

Post by koomzzz »

Why don't we leave the ADHL bickering for ADHL? We had a team miss 850 this year anyway, and he made a few deals in an attempt to get there. Then you have examples such as ADHL BOS who made that effort from a team that had nothing, still has prospects and made 950, barely, but he did it.

Always going to be differing opinions on this anyway. But I think 850 decreases parity over the long term
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to