Buds Board Keepers League

Ryan Whitney
Tomas Fleischmann
Teemu Selanne

hit me up if interested.

This is false advertising! No way you would offer the savings that most retail outlets are giving on Boxing day.

flash i like

have already offered on Whitney.

facey wroteCOLONhave already offered on Whitney.

lol Gonchar + Budish isn't exactly an offer. i realize i've made my own share of lowballs as i say this though .

SuperMario wroteCOLON

facey wroteCOLONhave already offered on Whitney.

lol Gonchar + Budish isn't exactly an offer. i realize i've made my own share of lowballs as i say this though .

IMO thats a pretty solid offer

sgupca wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

facey wroteCOLONhave already offered on Whitney.

lol Gonchar + Budish isn't exactly an offer. i realize i've made my own share of lowballs as i say this though .

IMO thats a pretty solid offer

Yup

Starpainter wroteCOLON

sgupca wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

facey wroteCOLONhave already offered on Whitney.

lol Gonchar + Budish isn't exactly an offer. i realize i've made my own share of lowballs as i say this though .

IMO thats a pretty solid offer

Yup

$1.5m in cap and 9 years in age is worth budish? short term we are both competing teams so cap is critical esp for almost identical players. long term age is everything. you guys are out of your mind.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

Starpainter wroteCOLON

sgupca wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

facey wroteCOLONhave already offered on Whitney.

lol Gonchar + Budish isn't exactly an offer. i realize i've made my own share of lowballs as i say this though .

IMO thats a pretty solid offer

Yup

$1.5m in cap and 9 years in age is worth budish? short term we are both competing teams so cap is critical esp for almost identical players. long term age is everything. you guys are out of your mind.

Gonchar is better than Whitney

the age thing doens't matter cause you're getting a nice young prospect in return...who by-the-way tore up for Nashville at their development camp this summer. Therefore, the 9 years difference is cancelled out by Budish....because he's the youngest player in the deal.

I don't see a better offer than that, for Whitney

sgupca wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON
$1.5m in cap and 9 years in age is worth budish? short term we are both competing teams so cap is critical esp for almost identical players. long term age is everything. you guys are out of your mind.

Gonchar is better than Whitney

the age thing doens't matter cause you're getting a nice young prospect in return...who by-the-way tore up for Nashville at their development camp this summer. Therefore, the 9 years difference is cancelled out by Budish....because he's the youngest player in the deal.

I don't see a better offer than that, for Whitney

steve. think logically. all competing teams are right up against the cap. how does adding 1.5m make sense when i am less than 1m close to the cap and not only that but i need to compete this year. gonchar is not better than whitney. even if he is the difference is marginal. and you can say whatever you want for budish but i care about winning this year and nick is trying to do the same.

so 1) i'd strengthen nick by giving him more cap room. 2) id fuck myself over cap wise.

would you have added 1.5m in cap unnecessarily when you had ov, crosby and the twins?

p.s. i have better offers than that for whitney and they fit my needs more. i just havent made up my mind to move him yet/no offer has jumped at me to make me want to pull the trigger right away.

SuperMario wroteCOLON
steve. think logically. all competing teams are right up against the cap. how does adding 1.5m make sense when i am less than 1m close to the cap and not only that but i need to compete this year. gonchar is not better than whitney. even if he is the difference is marginal. and you can say whatever you want for budish but i care about winning this year and nick is trying to do the same.

so 1) i'd strengthen nick by giving him more cap room. 2) id fuck myself over cap wise.

would you have added 1.5m in cap unnecessarily when you had ov, crosby and the twins?

I wasn't suggesting cap buddy...LOL

i was breaking the trade down in terms of value....

in a cap world it makes it completely different.

sgupca wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON
steve. think logically. all competing teams are right up against the cap. how does adding 1.5m make sense when i am less than 1m close to the cap and not only that but i need to compete this year. gonchar is not better than whitney. even if he is the difference is marginal. and you can say whatever you want for budish but i care about winning this year and nick is trying to do the same.

so 1) i'd strengthen nick by giving him more cap room. 2) id fuck myself over cap wise.

would you have added 1.5m in cap unnecessarily when you had ov, crosby and the twins?

I wasn't suggesting cap buddy...LOL

i was breaking the trade down in terms of value....

in a cap world it makes it completely different.

and you cannot break the trade down in terms of value without considering that we live in a cap world lol.

to be fair, you originally gawked at the offer, calling it low-ball as if it wasn't close value-wise with no mention of anything cap related.

anton wroteCOLONto be fair, you originally gawked at the offer, calling it low-ball as if it wasn't close value-wise with no mention of anything cap related.

i said whitney for gonchar + budish isnt an offer worth even considering and i stand by that. for two competing teams how can cap not be a decisive factor in deciding value when all else is equal (here age is not but whatever)? i think people are separating value from cap but for me the two are interrelated.

You called it a bad offer, a low ball; Gonchar in a slump is the same/slightly better then Whitney playing very well. But like I told you at the time, I only made that offer so that I could do another trade, as this individual trade would be a loss for me.

SuperMario wroteCOLON

anton wroteCOLONto be fair, you originally gawked at the offer, calling it low-ball as if it wasn't close value-wise with no mention of anything cap related.

i said whitney for gonchar + budish isnt an offer worth even considering and i stand by that. for two competing teams how can cap not be a decisive factor in deciding value when all else is equal (here age is not but whatever)? i think people are separating value from cap but for me the two are interrelated.

a "low-ball" offer implies that the vaue is way off

What did you trade to get Whitney again?

bcool wroteCOLONWhat did you trade to get Whitney again?

some left over christmas turds

I like Flash too