Page 4 of 4

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:59 am
by anton
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONHey, not saying it wasn't a fair deal, but giving up Colborne as well? Heh. We both know the resell value on that one. And since when does Shiv know what he's doing? lol
nino + colborne for clowe is a very sound offer for anyone trying to immediately improve their team.

this, on the other hand, reeks of frank - taking 1 piece of good value and turning it into 4 or 5 with little.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:59 am
by Chris
To Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:00 am
by Robin Hood
schenn>brassard + like 5 prospects> connolly> pominville> kessel>grabovski + oshie>richards + simmonds> zetterberg + marleau

with prospects left to spare from what you sent me for Schenn. So please don't criticize my GMing ;).

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:01 am
by Robin Hood
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONTo Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
Ask any GM in this league, your team is far worse than what you started with.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:07 am
by Chris
Wish I could get a snapshot of the team I had before I took over it. From what I read and discussed, Bergey, Tony, Mash, and a handful of others did the peripheral build with few high upside pieces after seeing everyone was going after scorers. To my recollection, Vancouver had Oleksiak, Granlund (who I think is complete and utter shit), Bennett, Couture, and MAF as the core pieces going forward.

Now, I have Schenn, Wilson, Nino, OEL, Poulin, Strome, Miller, B. Smith, Morrow, and many others who are near locks to be pretty good players or better. Not sure how I fucked up. Meanwhile, you actually tried to tank -- and failed at that if that's even possible. I get it. People want to win here. I want a dynasty. Simple as that.

And heh, yea, let's pretend that Vancouver remotely had close to the teams that Steve, Nick, Scott, and others had before I took over. Yup, he was going to win this year.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:09 am
by Chris
SuperMario wroteCOLON
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONTo Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
Ask any GM in this league, your team is far worse than what you started with.
Ask any GM in this league: none of you didn't disagree when I said that Vancouver wasn't a team that could contend without high quality pieces.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:11 am
by Robin Hood
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLON
SuperMario wroteCOLON
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONTo Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
Ask any GM in this league, your team is far worse than what you started with.
Ask any GM in this league: none of you didn't disagree when I said that Vancouver wasn't a team that could contend without high quality pieces.
I'll let Kareem/Anton take this one so that it doesn't sound like I'm biased ;).

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:12 am
by Chris
Of course you would. Kareem was one of those who agreed. And to my recollection, you did too. Quite tired of the hypocrisy. I'm going to bed. Good night.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:13 am
by MSP4LYFE
Chris, you are out of your mind if you think Shiv ever wanted to tank...It`s not difficult to assemble a terrible team.

As for the Vancouver team of past and present, I`m not touching that one with a ten foot pole.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 2:15 am
by anton
Vancouver was a very underrated/under the radar team when Chris took over. I can understand how it would be difficult for a new GM to come in and immediately appreciate what he had, but to say your team has a better outlook now than it had then is absolutely false.

You havent done a terrible job by any stretch, but I wouldn't be bragging about what you've accomplished either.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:33 am
by Shep
I think you all need to get in a room together, have a bukkake with Frank and be done with it.

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:59 pm
by kimmer
Shep wroteCOLONI think you all need to get in a room together, have a bukkake with Frank and be done with it.
Somebody is into Japanese pr0n

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:34 pm
by foolama
i enjoy the blurred naughty bits...makes my imagination tingle......

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

PostedCOLON Fri Nov 11, 2011 6:14 pm
by kimmer
LOOOOOOL