http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3669H MART wroteCOLONFYI, Daymond Langkow traded to Phoenix. Also I think he should have W eligibility yes?
All I'm saying is, that he should be listed under PHOENIX, not CALGARYkyuss wroteCOLONhttp://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3669H MART wroteCOLONFYI, Daymond Langkow traded to Phoenix. Also I think he should have W eligibility yes?
he is on the list => he is a C
unless you show otherwise by using our criteria.
in his case you have to check numbers for his last season that meets our GP requirements.
Calgary
a Olli Jokinen
a Matt Stajan
a Brendan Morrison
a Mikael Backlund
c David Moss FOR = .458
a* Daymon Langkow
ok, nice.. just didn't see him in the list in the OPMSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYeah, I already posted that Scott.
http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4903 ... nen#p63507The Devil wroteCOLONTeemu Hartikainen C->W?
Who isn't eligible for early update?kyuss wroteCOLONhttp://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4903 ... nen#p63507The Devil wroteCOLONTeemu Hartikainen C->W?
he is eligible for early update though.
http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3663The Devil wroteCOLONWho isn't eligible for early update?kyuss wroteCOLONhttp://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4903 ... nen#p63507The Devil wroteCOLONTeemu Hartikainen C->W?
he is eligible for early update though.
all the others are not -> for them update will happen (if necessary) on ASG break.- early updates
Two categories of centers are eligible for an early update during the season:
- centers whose FOR was <.4 in the previous season
- rookies (to be precise: centers who played less than 26 games the previous season and never reached 40 gp in one NHL season; i.e. centers whose position is still determined off nhl.com draft lists, or off CBS for undrafted players).
Unfortunately he does not qualify for an early review, his FOR last year was over .75 (something like 935 draws in 1200 toi). It was believed only *fringe* players (+ sophomores & rookies) should be early reviewed. Very tough with Gagner as he's been a pure centre for 3+ years going into this year, however with 66 FOT in 202.29 TOI his FOR is actually still over .3 (.316) meaning even if he was eligible for review, he'd remain a C.Scott wroteCOLONSam Gagner?
He's playing C now anyway.. it was just the first bit of the season where he was playing the wing. I was just checking.Nick wroteCOLONUnfortunately he does not qualify for an early review, his FOR last year was over .75 (something like 935 draws in 1200 toi). It was believed only *fringe* players (+ rookies) should be early reviewed. Very tough with Gagner as he's been a pure centre for 3+ years going into this year, however with 66 FOT in 202.29 TOI his FOR is actually still over .3 (.316) meaning even if he was eligible for review, he'd remain a C.Scott wroteCOLONSam Gagner?
