and some people dont pay enough attention to those hit/pim cats.Nick wroteCOLONI like BBKL Flip. People get stuck at low hit/pim #, 2 categories i'd happily drop in place for more reliable scoring.
It's all about a good balance..
and some people dont pay enough attention to those hit/pim cats.Nick wroteCOLONI like BBKL Flip. People get stuck at low hit/pim #, 2 categories i'd happily drop in place for more reliable scoring.
probably the best offer i've seen on here so farShep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
No thank you.Shep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
Is that really this year's to date scoring? God damn Brodziak's gotten horribleShep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
So what you're saying is that you haven't seen 1 MIN game this year.gooker wroteCOLONIs that really this year's to date scoring? God damn Brodziak's gotten horribleShep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
You think you're the only one who can troll around here? haha.gooker wroteCOLONlol please don't pull that on me you are such a joker
Stats trump all.SuperMario wroteCOLONSo what you're saying is that you haven't seen 1 MIN game this year.gooker wroteCOLONIs that really this year's to date scoring? God damn Brodziak's gotten horribleShep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
Large sample sizes trump streaks (good or bad).Shep wroteCOLONStats trump all.SuperMario wroteCOLONSo what you're saying is that you haven't seen 1 MIN game this year.gooker wroteCOLONIs that really this year's to date scoring? God damn Brodziak's gotten horribleShep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
Going back 3 years still looks good to me.SuperMario wroteCOLONLarge sample sizes trump streaks (good or bad).Shep wroteCOLONStats trump all.SuperMario wroteCOLONSo what you're saying is that you haven't seen 1 MIN game this year.gooker wroteCOLONIs that really this year's to date scoring? God damn Brodziak's gotten horribleShep wroteCOLONBrodziak for Armstrong and Halpern
GG.
http://bbkl.hockey.cbssports.com/player ... :p/scoring?
You should really stick with Armstrong and Halpern then. Things that put the conversation into context don't matter obviously. i.e. future performance vs past performance, prime vs past prime, trade value vs stat value (which by the way, Brodziak is still the best player in)Shep wroteCOLONGoing back 3 years still looks good to me.SuperMario wroteCOLONLarge sample sizes trump streaks (good or bad).Shep wroteCOLON Stats trump all.
Yea - I probably got a little too annoyed there lol.Shep wroteCOLONI looked at past as I said by looking at the BBKL stats for the past 3 years. Where did I deny Brodziak was the best of the 3? Why would I trade 2 players for somebody that is worse?
Punting FOW or any category is silly. starting any week down 0-1-0 is suicide as so many playoff matchups end 6-7-3, 8-7-1, 8-6-2 etc. Also brodziak is on pace for about 660 this season. That's Datsyuk/Mikko FOW territory - 2 of the FOW studss you're talking about.Shep wroteCOLONBecause about 20 teams, me included, have punted FOW due to the fact that those FOW studs are spread around 5-6 teams. There's no point in trying to compete with them.
Also, considering Brodziak has broken 700 FOW once and is on pace for less than that this season, I'm in no rush to trade studs for a 2-trick pony.
Shep and I are on the same page with regards to this...It's the one stat cat I have essentially just given up on. At least to the top end teams.Shep wroteCOLONBecause about 20 teams, me included, have punted FOW due to the fact that those FOW studs are spread around 5-6 teams. There's no point in trying to compete with them.
Also, considering Brodziak has broken 700 FOW once and is on pace for less than that this season, I'm in no rush to trade studs for a 2-trick pony.
Basically no point when there are teams like TB and TOR, if you are thinking in the big picture and a what-if situation. I see nothing wrong with conceding that stat. It would be cool if we could start 5 more Wingers instead of centers, tbh. If you want to go after C's and get that category, power to you but if you want to concede that and roll with all Wingers, high five!KapG wroteCOLONShep and I are on the same page with regards to this...It's the one stat cat I have essentially just given up on. At least to the top end teams.Shep wroteCOLONBecause about 20 teams, me included, have punted FOW due to the fact that those FOW studs are spread around 5-6 teams. There's no point in trying to compete with them.
Also, considering Brodziak has broken 700 FOW once and is on pace for less than that this season, I'm in no rush to trade studs for a 2-trick pony.