LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:32 pm
To Los Angeles:
2012 1st Rd DET
To St Louis
Jimmy Hayes
2012 1st Rd DET
To St Louis
Jimmy Hayes
Page 1 of 2
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:36 pm
LOL
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:37 pm
easily worth twice that
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:39 pm
is this a joke?
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:41 pm
please guys, let shep confirm before posting
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:43 pm
sorry sirsgupca wroteCOLONplease guys, let shep confirm before posting
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:44 pm
Miscommunication, I left and something was posted
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:44 pm
no worries shep, maybe next time fair deals steve can strike again!
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:45 pm
We have rules in place for a reason. If we need to start handing out infractions after multiple warnings.. so be it.. It's gone on long enough.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:45 pm
For a guy who's more of a cunt than I am, you sure do have an odd sense of authority.Kezia wroteCOLONWe have rules in place for a reason. If we need to start handing out infractions after multiple warnings.. so be it.. It's gone on long enough.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:46 pm
There's a reason why I was made a moderator on the forums.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:47 pm
Perhaps true, but at the same time if a trade doesn't go through because of prematurely posted comments I'd say its an issue. Whether its the case here or not I don't know.Chris wroteCOLONFor a guy who's more of a cunt than I am, you sure do have an odd sense of authority.Kezia wroteCOLONWe have rules in place for a reason. If we need to start handing out infractions after multiple warnings.. so be it.. It's gone on long enough.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:47 pm
No need for infractions, this was just miscommunicationsKezia wroteCOLONWe have rules in place for a reason. If we need to start handing out infractions after multiple warnings.. so be it.. It's gone on long enough.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:48 pm
Miscommunications. No worries gentlemen.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:48 pm
Oh my god, a moderator?! On the internet?! Were you trained to protect the lay of the land and then promised scaling wages?Kezia wroteCOLONThere's a reason why I was made a moderator on the forums.
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:50 pm
as commander of BBKL, ill allow this
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:51 pm
no warnings needed guys, i can explain how shep and i got confused
no biggie, fair deals steve wants to make sure everyone has a fair deal and good conversation during the deadline
no biggie, fair deals steve wants to make sure everyone has a fair deal and good conversation during the deadline
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:53 pm
fun thread guys
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:53 pm
Lol at the trolling in this thread
Re: LAK - STL
PostedCOLON Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:56 pm
