The Ultimate Fantasy Hockey Experience
https://bbkl.ca/
Things can change. But it looks like his defense could use a bit of work.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou have a pretty decent team, but nowhere near the best in the West. Los Angeles and Colorado are still notably better, IMO.
Weak D, poor face off centers, and a young goalie with only one good year under his belt. Good team, but not great, LAK and Colorado are great, but you are right in pointing out that alot can (and likely will) change between now and the playoffs.hockeysense wroteCOLONThings can change. But it looks like his defense could use a bit of work.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou have a pretty decent team, but nowhere near the best in the West. Los Angeles and Colorado are still notably better, IMO.
Two risky players, but the payoff could be huge (especially with Bogosian).anton wroteCOLONfuck prospects
marleau for penner + bogosian
i can live with that
Sure you do.The Devil wroteCOLONReally liking Anton's team.. I think he could easily challenge for best in the West.
you have a point with the faceoffs, but i wouldnt call my D weak. my top 4 is fine: johnson, bogosian, shattenkirk, gorges. my 5 and 6 could definitely be better, but compared to the rest of the league as a whole i would call my D average rather than weak. it's very young for sure.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON
Weak D, poor face off centers, and a young goalie with only one good year under his belt. Good team, but not great, LAK and Colorado are great, but you are right in pointing out that alot can (and likely will) change between now and the playoffs.
I typed "in comparison to LAK and COL", but must have backspaced by accident. Your D definitely isn't weak on its own merit, but not unlike my defense it pales in comparison to the elite in the league. That being said, no one has the perfect team in September.anton wroteCOLONyou have a point with the faceoffs, but i wouldnt call my D weak. my top 4 is fine: johnson, bogosian, shattenkirk, gorges. my 5 and 6 could definitely be better, but compared to the rest of the league as a whole i would call my D average rather than weak. it's very young for sure.MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON
Weak D, poor face off centers, and a young goalie with only one good year under his belt. Good team, but not great, LAK and Colorado are great, but you are right in pointing out that alot can (and likely will) change between now and the playoffs.
my strength is my forward core which i think is as good as any in the league.
i appreciate the support kareem, but i'm not sure, i'll post our rosters side by side. I'd say they are pretty close (only advantage i'd give me is maybe - and a big maybe - is my defense)MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou have a pretty decent team, but nowhere near the best in the West. Los Angeles and Colorado are still notably better, IMO.
anton wroteCOLONand with that i am closed for business. going to sydney until just before roster submission.
western conference champs:
Penner - Staal - Selanne
Kulemin - Backes - Clowe (lol beast line)
Hartnell - Sharp - Grabner
McMillan - Thompson - Wheeler
Johnson - Shattenkirk
Bogosian - Gorges
Hjalmarsson - Foster
Crawford
Raycroft