Buds Board Keepers League

Again, these may be a little controversial and some might not agree but I don't care. My 2 BBKL championships will block my vision (yes, stolen from Patrick Roy.. kinda ). I'm going to give tips on how to build a winner in this league to hopefully help some of you guys. These tips I will fully endorse and actual strategies I use myself. Use them if you'd like to and feel free to ask me on msn to clarify anything you do not understand.

Tip # 2: Remember, all categories count

When building your team don't forget about some categories, they all count the same. If you are weak in a certain category, trade based on getting stronger where you are weak. If you are already very strong somewhere why worry about getting better there? This tip is pretty self explanatory but I find a lot of you guys don't pay attention to this. It is so simple.

Just look at Shiv's team last season. Tons of offense, stpts, but really weak hits, PIMS, etc.. he would've need a horseshoe up his ass to win last season. Also, pay attention to which categories are toughest to pad.. and hoard those players that score highly in that category. In my opinion those are hits, BS, PIMS, FOWs & shtoi. Some agree, some disagree. Those categories are the toughest to stack. Oh, and SOG is a very underrated category too. Guys like David Booth, Radim Vrbata, & Michael Frolik were in the top 30 in the NHL in SOG. Keep your eyes open on any player that can help you where you need help the most.

Until next time.. good luck

I've struggled with this philosophy for two seasons now, switching back and forth on what method is best. I still think you can win by specializing stats, but I am becoming more and more skeptical of that approach by the season.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI've struggled with this philosophy for two seasons now, switching back and forth on what method is best. I still think you can win by specializing stats, but I am becoming more and more skeptical of that approach by the season.

I clearly didn't win, but I made it to the WCF (I know, easy conference, etc.) but my team was primarily made up of the periph stats and goaltending.

I think if you are 100% offence, and I mean 100% with goaltending, you could be successful but never win.

The problem with being completely one-sided in stats is it relies on you winning all stats.

Exactly Shep, if you are a balanced team and strong everywhere you are less likely to suffer a big loss during a slow week. You will, more times then not actually pull out the victory. If you are heavy in a few stats, much tougher to win.

Snipeshow wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI've struggled with this philosophy for two seasons now, switching back and forth on what method is best. I still think you can win by specializing stats, but I am becoming more and more skeptical of that approach by the season.

I clearly didn't win, but I made it to the WCF (I know, easy conference, etc.) but my team was primarily made up of the periph stats and goaltending.

I think if you are 100% offence, and I mean 100% with goaltending, you could be successful but never win.

The problem with being completely one-sided in stats is it relies on you winning all stats.

Let me clarify by stating that I have no intention of building around goaltending, quite the opposite in fact. The uncertainty in goaltending from week to week is the primary reason behind my approach; I think you can win more weeks with a cheap, mediocre goalie that pulls out average stats, and a top heavy team.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Snipeshow wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI've struggled with this philosophy for two seasons now, switching back and forth on what method is best. I still think you can win by specializing stats, but I am becoming more and more skeptical of that approach by the season.

I clearly didn't win, but I made it to the WCF (I know, easy conference, etc.) but my team was primarily made up of the periph stats and goaltending.

I think if you are 100% offence, and I mean 100% with goaltending, you could be successful but never win.

The problem with being completely one-sided in stats is it relies on you winning all stats.

Let me clarify by stating that I have no intention of building around goaltending, quite the opposite in fact. The uncertainty in goaltending from week to week is the primary reason behind my approach; I think you can win more weeks with a cheap, mediocre goalie that pulls out average stats, and a top heavy team.

I absolutely agree. I wasn't saying building around goaltending. But I meant building a one-dimensional team relies heavily on goaltending to win the stats to win the week.

Snipeshow wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Snipeshow wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI've struggled with this philosophy for two seasons now, switching back and forth on what method is best. I still think you can win by specializing stats, but I am becoming more and more skeptical of that approach by the season.

I clearly didn't win, but I made it to the WCF (I know, easy conference, etc.) but my team was primarily made up of the periph stats and goaltending.

I think if you are 100% offence, and I mean 100% with goaltending, you could be successful but never win.

The problem with being completely one-sided in stats is it relies on you winning all stats.

Let me clarify by stating that I have no intention of building around goaltending, quite the opposite in fact. The uncertainty in goaltending from week to week is the primary reason behind my approach; I think you can win more weeks with a cheap, mediocre goalie that pulls out average stats, and a top heavy team.

I absolutely agree. I wasn't saying building around goaltending. But I meant building a one-dimensional team relies heavily on goaltending to win the stats to win the week.

Absolutely.

i think building a one-dimensional team is possible. but i think im the only one in this league that thinks so lol.

SuperMario wroteCOLONi think building a one-dimensional team is possible. but i think im the only one in this league that thinks so lol.

Oh no, it's definitely possible to build one.. it's winning with that team that's pretty much impossible

The Devil wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLONi think building a one-dimensional team is possible. but i think im the only one in this league that thinks so lol.

Oh no, it's definitely possible to build one.. it's winning with that team that's pretty much impossible

i think its very possible lol. but meh

SuperMario wroteCOLON

The Devil wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLONi think building a one-dimensional team is possible. but i think im the only one in this league that thinks so lol.

Oh no, it's definitely possible to build one.. it's winning with that team that's pretty much impossible

i think its very possible lol. but meh

Just as likely as winning with 7-2 at the poker table.. it happens but it's a long shot

Purely offense doesn't work

i tried it this year, it was a failing grade

Oh man... I'm with Shiv here. Smart category targeting is the best way to beat the other top teams. By that I mean, if your not Scott or Bryan (both of whom have balanced builds and score near the top in most categories), the best way to beat them moving forward, is to specifically build to be borderline unbeatable at certain categories, competitive where the asset management allows it, and ignore the ones that hinder your other categories (PIMS for me)

The real trick is not to deal away start players for prospects or lesser players. That is how teams like Scott's are built.

sgupca wroteCOLONPurely offense doesn't work

I'll show you how its done lol. I already have 3 of the top point getters for next year.

offense comes and goes, but periphs are forever

SuperMario wroteCOLON

sgupca wroteCOLONPurely offense doesn't work

I'll show you how its done lol. I already have 3 of the top point getters for next year.

i had THE top 3 last year (to start this year)

Crosby
Ovey
Sedin
Sedin

been there, done that...didn't work well

sgupca wroteCOLON

SuperMario wroteCOLON

sgupca wroteCOLONPurely offense doesn't work

I'll show you how its done lol. I already have 3 of the top point getters for next year.

i had THE top 3 last year (to start this year)

Crosby
Ovey
Sedin
Sedin

been there, done that...didn't work well

ovey is not worth 9+m. crosby was unreal. sedins were awesome. but the rest of your team sucked including goaltending.

you've turned it around nicely since then.