Page 1 of 2

CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:20 am
by kimmer
To CAR: Johan Harju + Ryan Bourque
To TOR: Ryan Wilson

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:40 am
by Mike
Starpainter wroteCOLON
Dolomite wroteCOLONTo Carolina:
Johan Harju
Ryan Bourque

To Toronto:
Ryan Wilson
Confirmed.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:48 am
by Nick
Note: I cleared repeat post.


Nice trade guys.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:55 am
by Tony
Does Bryan (bcool) approve? ;)

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:56 am
by Mike
Nighthock wroteCOLONDoes Bryan (bcool) approve? ;)
He has approved of this deal.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:25 am
by Scott
I would've gotten you more Paul ;)

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:31 am
by Mash
Dolomite wroteCOLONTo CAR: Johan Harju + Ryan Bourque
To TOR: Ryan Wilson

Hey man great to see you making your first moves for future reference post like:

To Carolina:

Johan Harju
Ryan Bourque

To Toronto:

Ryan Wilson

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:43 am
by bma
Nighthock wroteCOLONDoes Bryan (bcool) approve? ;)
Damn right.

Side note: Msn me when you can, want to acquire one of your players :)

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:04 am
by anton
cute trade

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:50 am
by Shoalzie
Again, welcome to the league Kim!

There isn't a waiting period on trades for a new GM?

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:41 am
by cliff11
Nice trade guys.... I thought it was two weeks am I wrong???

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:01 am
by kyuss
i think the 2 week period was lifted because of his cap and goaltending situation.

http://www.bbklhockey.com/viewtopic.php ... 241#p28001

i guess an announcement through a dedicated thread would have helped most of those GMs who are not part of the Administration and CC group.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:12 am
by MSP4LYFE
I'm not even sure why TBH, I would assume it is a combination of the cap, and goaltending, plus Dolomite was technically apart of this league for more than 2 weeks.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:30 am
by kyuss
MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON.. plus Dolomite was technically apart of this league for more than 2 weeks.
yeah, forgot to mention that as well.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:32 am
by Shep
He also has a trade advisor in bcool.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:39 am
by Robin Hood
I like the buddy system more than the 2-week probation program. Message to CC: Make it a new rule. It will make the transition into the league far easier.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:41 am
by armandtanzarian
SuperMario wroteCOLONI like the buddy system more than the 2-week probation program. Message to CC: Make it a new rule. It will make the transition into the league far easier.
Pretty sure we did that...only problem was the buddies tended to rape there little brothers. ;)

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:59 am
by Robin Hood
mr. bruin wroteCOLON
SuperMario wroteCOLONI like the buddy system more than the 2-week probation program. Message to CC: Make it a new rule. It will make the transition into the league far easier.
Pretty sure we did that...only problem was the buddies tended to rape there little brothers. ;)
are you talking about the time you raped your brother to get Ryan Callahan?

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:40 am
by Shep
susf.

Re: CAR <-> TOR Trade

PostedCOLON Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:49 am
by inferno31
I hope the CC and the admin team don't have that short of a memory. The two week rule is there because we had so many GMs get absolutely raped in their first 2 weeks. Look at the bottom feeders of the league and you'll see new owners destroyed before they got accustomed. Yes we've had a few GMs who grabbed the reins right away, but exceptions don't make the rule. I'd much rather play it safe than sorry, unless you guys would like to pick the scraps off a few more teams I wouldn't suggest change. I'm all for the exception when cap issues are involved, but thats about it.