Page 1 of 6
Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:04 pm
by Mike
To spare you all the suspense,
Frank will not be booted.
It is also worth noting that this is not the place to discuss my refusal to allow Frank's late trade for Jason blake to go through. That was my decision, and it is a precedent I will stand behind: no late movement on CBS will be tolerated.
Now, Frank already had one strike against him for bad claims.
His second strike is for dressing 5 d-men today, which infringes on rule 4-2-2
4-2-2 : Teams must have between six (6) and seven (7) defensemen
His third strike is for being under the salary cap, which infringes on rule 5-1-2
$3 000 001 - ++ - Team loses their lottery eligibility and forfeits a 1st round pick in the upcoming year (first their pick, if that is not owned then a 1st belonging to another team will suffice.) Admin and CC will discuss removal of a GM in question.
Although the CC has decided not to remove Frank from the league he will face stern consequences. For one,
Frank will remain on a very strict leash for the remainder of our season. One more infraction, however small, and he is gone. Second, as per the rules, Frank is being fined a first round pick. In lieu of his pick, his only first rounder (PHI 1st '11) will be removed.
For now the pick will be placed in limbo, as it were.
Edit 1: I forgot to add, Frank has been granted clemency for any other previous offenses. Any players that were sent to the minors and needed to clear waivers will now be waived.
Edit 2: the pick is PHI 1st '11
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:19 pm
by bma
Starpainter wroteCOLONTo spare you all the suspense,
Frank will not be booted.
It is also worth noting that this is not the place to discuss my refusal to allow Frank's late trade for Jason blake to go through. That was my decision, and it is a precedent I will stand behind: no late movement on CBS will be tolerated.
Now, Frank already had one strike against him for bad claims.
His second strike is for dressing 5 d-men today, which infringes on rule 4-2-2
4-2-2 : Teams must have between six (6) and seven (7) defensemen
His third strike is for being under the salary cap, which infringes on rule 5-1-2
$3 000 001 - ++ - Team loses their lottery eligibility and forfeits a 1st round pick in the upcoming year (first their pick, if that is not owned then a 1st belonging to another team will suffice.) Admin and CC will discuss removal of a GM in question.
Although the CC has decided not to remove Frank from the league he will face stern consequences. For one,
Frank will remain on a very strict leash for the remainder of our season. One more infraction, however small, and he is gone. Second, as per the rules, Frank is being fined a first round pick. In lieu of his pick, his only first rounder (DAL 1st '11) will be removed.
For now the pick will be placed in limbo, as it were.
What does that mean?
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:20 pm
by Mike
bcool wroteCOLONWhat does that mean?
Any infraction and he's gone. Probation.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:22 pm
by bma
Starpainter wroteCOLONbcool wroteCOLONWhat does that mean?
Any infraction and he's gone. Probation.
So he still has all his picks?
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:23 pm
by Mike
bcool wroteCOLONStarpainter wroteCOLONbcool wroteCOLONWhat does that mean?
Any infraction and he's gone. Probation.
So he still has all his picks?
No, he loses DAL 1st '11.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:28 pm
by Mike
Starpainter wroteCOLONbcool wroteCOLONStarpainter wroteCOLONbcool wroteCOLONWhat does that mean?
Any infraction and he's gone. Probation.
So he still has all his picks?
No, he loses PHI 1st '11.
Edit: PHI 1st, not DAL. I am le tired.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:32 pm
by Shoalzie
So, does that Blake move go through for next week then? He's back where he needs to be with the salary floor?
Is that pick vacated then? Are there only going to be 29 picks in the first round?
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:34 pm
by Chuck Norris
Shoalzie wroteCOLON
Is that pick vacated then? Are there only going to be 29 picks in the first round?
Its in limbo, meaning they havent decided what is to be done with it yet.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:35 pm
by Mike
Shoalzie wroteCOLONSo, does that Blake move go through for next week then? He's back where he needs to be with the salary floor?
That trade is void. He needs to get up to the floor ASAP.
Is that pick vacated then? Are there only going to be 29 picks in the first round?
At this point, consider this to be true. We have not decided yet.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:35 pm
by bma
Gotcha.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:35 pm
by Shoalzie
Habber wroteCOLONShoalzie wroteCOLON
Is that pick vacated then? Are there only going to be 29 picks in the first round?
Its in limbo, meaning they havent decided what is to be done with it yet.
Sorry...I just re-read Mike's and saw that. Thanks!
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:37 pm
by inferno31
I think odds are in terms of the pick is if Frank makes it to the draft we go with 29 picks, if Frank doesn't his successor gets the pick returned. I think its how we've operated with previous fines, not certain though.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:41 pm
by Nick
inferno31 wroteCOLONI think odds are in terms of the pick is if Frank makes it to the draft we go with 29 picks, if Frank doesn't his successor gets the pick returned. I think its how we've operated with previous fines, not certain though.
That's accurate; though some details are still being discussed.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:06 pm
by fedro91
So I guest I'm in limbo for now. As for my stay I won't say anything since I know there's a couple gm fighting for me and it would be rude to take Toronto proposal.
For now I will do nothing till there's a rulling.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:32 pm
by Shep
Frank youve made solid strides in Improving your team but made silly errors to get yourself inthis situation.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:34 pm
by Mike
fedro91 wroteCOLONSo I guest I'm in limbo for now. As for my stay I won't say anything since I know there's a couple gm fighting for me and it would be rude to take Toronto proposal.
For now I will do nothing till there's a rulling.
Don't think of me as "Toronto". Think of me as "Admin".
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:11 pm
by Tony
Starpainter wroteCOLON
Don't think of me as "Toronto". Think of me as "Admin".
Or "God"
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:17 pm
by Nick
From my POV this is not final, the topic has not been given due-diligence.
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:18 pm
by inferno31
facey wroteCOLONFrom my POV this is not final, the topic has not been given due-diligence.
+1
Re: Ruling on Fedro91 (DAL)
PostedCOLON Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:23 pm
by Shep
I have a question, what happens with the match-up between Frank and I as he is playing with an illegal roster?
Nothing? Just he gets fined?