Buds Board Keepers League

To me: Blake

TO Flyers: 2nd detroit + 2nd dallas

all 2012



If it s not eleiglble for the line up then no good.

frank, its a giant pain in the ass to add these trades to the confirmed list if you don't format them properly.

fedro91 wroteCOLONTo me: Blake

TO Flyers: 2nd detroit + 2nd dallas

all 2012



If it s not eleiglble for the line up then no good.

7:03 - roster locks were 6:55.

Confirmed .can we please have this edited on CBS?I can't right now

Kezia wroteCOLONConfirmed .can we please have this edited on CBS?I can't right now

To clarify, this goes through for Week 9

Starpainter wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONConfirmed .can we please have this edited on CBS?I can't right now

To clarify, this goes through for Week 9

I said I only accept this deal if i count for this week. So no deal. If I m screwd i won t accept this deal. I said in my post

fedro91 wroteCOLON

Starpainter wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONConfirmed .can we please have this edited on CBS?I can't right now

To clarify, this goes through for Week 9

I said I only accept this deal if i count for this week. So no deal. If I m screwd i won t accept this deal. I said in my post

In that case the deal is cancelled.

Kezia wroteCOLONConfirmed .can we please have this edited on CBS?I can't right now

like i said if it doesn t go threw then no deal

Can a 1time exception be granted in this case? I only ask because exceptions for similar situations have been granted before

Kezia wroteCOLONCan a 1time exception be granted in this case? I only ask because exceptions for similar situations have been granted before

Show me precedent? I'm disinclined to allow it.

Kezia wroteCOLONCan a 1time exception be granted in this case? I only ask because exceptions for similar situations have been granted before

does not compute.

Starpainter wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLONCan a 1time exception be granted in this case? I only ask because exceptions for similar situations have been granted before

Show me precedent? I'm disinclined to allow it.

Personally, I don't care if the trade goes through. I'm not below the cap floor. Nor do I feel like searching through hundreds of posts to find it. I'm asking as a favour to Frank.

Kezia wroteCOLONPersonally, I don't care if the trade goes through. I'm not below the cap floor. Nor do I feel like searching through hundreds of posts to find it. I'm asking as a favour to Frank.

Completely understand. If anyone would like to point out evidence that there is precedent for allowing a late trade please inform me or another member of the Admin/CC team so we can include it in our deliberation on the matter of Frank being under the floor.

I believe we have done it before. the trade was made before the puck dropped and blake is not in that trade.


I believe Kyle posted roster moves on the BBKL before doing them on CBS.

Wait is the issue here Frank getting punished for being under the floor?
Lets be reasonable guys, a few minutes late for a player who isn't active till much later tonight even. I know he broke a rule, but I think we should be reasonable about it, You'd be putting Frank up for removal with his next offense if you gave him a warning. As much as we all joke about him, look at what hes done with that team. Hes exactly the kind of GM we were looking for to fill that spot.

perhaps a slap on the wrist fine (4th rounder) and not the full letter to the law... 3 minutes shows understand and just a time management issue IMO.

note: frank you should have made this deal @ 3:30... and not after 4. Planning on people to stick up for you is not right.

lol were gonna fine him a 4th rounder for being 3 mins late.
come on guys.

facey wroteCOLONI believe we have done it before. the trade was made before the puck dropped and blake is not in that trade.


I believe Kyle posted roster moves on the BBKL before doing them on CBS.

This wasn't posted on BBKL until after roster lock either.

Okay on all counts no one here is saying Frank didn't fuck up. He did, its on him and yes he made a mistake.
But if your going to give him a second warning for a few minute infraction, it seems pretty unreasonable. The CC and Admin team should use some discretion here, this is not a situation where a GM has iced a team under the floor which is in no hope of reaching the floor, nor is it a situation where a team is obviously tanking (which was the heart of the rule). He has iced a competitive team, and at this time I think is a borderline playoff team. He broke a rule, we all see that, he broke the letter of the law, but putting him on notice for league removal seems to be overkill.

Its up to you guys what you do, but just voicing my opinion on the topic.

inferno31 wroteCOLONOkay on all counts no one here is saying Frank didn't fuck up. He did, its on him and yes he made a mistake.
But if your going to give him a second warning for a few minute infraction, it seems pretty unreasonable. The CC and Admin team should use some discretion here, this is not a situation where a GM has iced a team under the floor which is in no hope of reaching the floor, nor is it a situation where a team is obviously tanking (which was the heart of the rule). He has iced a competitive team, and at this time I think is a borderline playoff team. He broke a rule, we all see that, he broke the letter of the law, but putting him on notice for league removal seems to be overkill.

Its up to you guys what you do, but just voicing my opinion on the topic.

I appreciate your opinion, will take it into consideration.