Page 1 of 3
Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:20 pm
by Fraser
That Kane guy is pretty good.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:24 pm
by Bruyns
Fraser wroteCOLONThat Kane guy is pretty good.
2 goals, 6 shots, 4PIMs, 2 hits
Happy to have him on my team
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:30 pm
by Fraser
Bruyns wroteCOLONFraser wroteCOLONThat Kane guy is pretty good.
2 goals, 6 shots, 4PIMs, 2 hits
Happy to have him on my team
Him too
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:38 pm
by lightupdadarkness
Da Ghost!
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:40 pm
by Matthew
I actually believe ekholm may be a top 4 guy, or very close, but given miks argument stating he is top 4 cuz over the last 2 Nashville games he was 4th in avg icetime, I'd just like to point out that tonight he was 6th among nsh dmen.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:04 pm
by Sensfanjosh
I was watching that too Matthew haha
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:05 pm
by lightupdadarkness
Matthew wroteCOLONI actually believe ekholm may be a top 4 guy, or very close, but given miks argument stating he is top 4 cuz over the last 2 Nashville games he was 4th in avg icetime, I'd just like to point out that tonight he was 6th among nsh dmen.
Lmao
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:21 am
by kyuss
Matthew wroteCOLONI actually believe ekholm may be a top 4 guy, or very close, but given miks argument stating he is top 4
cuz over the last 2 Nashville games he was 4th in avg icetime, I'd just like to point out that tonight he was 6th among nsh dmen.
assuming "cuz" stays for "cause", I guess you are unsure about what the word "cause" really means.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:44 am
by Shep
"Because"
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:14 am
by Fraser
Learn English Euro
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:36 am
by kyuss
Shep wroteCOLON"Because"
exactly, by his post Matthew seems to struggle with the meaning of 'because'. In fact, I don't think I ever stated Ekholm is a top 4 D
because he played top 4 those last (not anymore) two games.
Fraser wroteCOLONLearn English Euro
Don't think he is Euro though.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:44 am
by kimmer
Oh..
So u saying ekholm is a top 4 based on skillz?
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:52 am
by Fraser
Ekholm is a #4. That is a fair assessment of skill.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:54 am
by Handsome&FairMike
Agreed. Second line pairing on most teams. Nashville is just deep.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:55 am
by kimmer
I heard he's worth Barkov lol
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:58 am
by Fraser
No #4 is worth Barkov. Disconnect there if thats what he's asking.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:08 am
by Matthew
kyuss wroteCOLONShep wroteCOLON"Because"
exactly, by his post Matthew seems to struggle with the meaning of 'because'. In fact, I don't think I ever stated Ekholm is a top 4 D
because he played top 4 those last (not anymore) two games.
Fraser wroteCOLONLearn English Euro
Don't think he is Euro though.
It's a pretty common english slang acronym for because. Not sure why you are attacking my grammar? Is it "cuz" I used a small sample size to disprove your small sample size, and thus, going down in flames you decided to grasp onto whatever stupid argument you could to save a Lil bit of pride? Poor form, jack my boy, poor form!
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:10 am
by Matthew
Anyways, I agreed he is a top 4 player. I didn't agree with your method of proving he is a top 4 player.
Friends?
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:29 pm
by kyuss
Fraser wroteCOLONNo #4 is worth Barkov. Disconnect there if thats what he's asking.
that's not, obviously.
Re: Week 9 Bitches
PostedCOLON Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:34 pm
by Tony
Sharks shit the bed last night... so much for this week.