Buds Board Keepers League

There's been some confusion on MSN... someone tells me one thing.. someone tells me another...

I just took over this team Monday night. I can't remember if I read it here or someone told me on msn.. That we have a couple of days whether or not to accept contracts after a player signs it, and if not, we can release that player.

Should that not be the case as well when a new GM takes over in the off season? Meaning that if a player signs in the off season, but before a new GM takes over, that GM should have the opportunity to decline that contract?

Or is that simply not the case at all?

We have a free drop period.. after that, guys who are signed needed to be claimed off of waivers to not be your property anymore

I think he's asking if he can judge any new contracts form this off season, and that seems fair to me. the power at be need to decide... however all the power to him IMO.

When is the "free release period" again?

mr. bruin wroteCOLONWhen is the "free release period" again?

it was from the end of the regular season to the start of the waiver draft.

facey wroteCOLONI think he's asking if he can judge any new contracts form this off season, and that seems fair to me. the power at be need to decide... however all the power to him IMO.

I told him this was OK. Anyone disagree?

Starpainter wroteCOLON
I told him this was OK. Anyone disagree?

I think its a good to give him a period until his trades are processed to have a free drop period.

Starpainter wroteCOLON I told him this was OK. Anyone disagree?

Seems fair enough. Damn this one quote thing is annoying. Mashley anything that could be done to fix that?

facey wroteCOLON
I think its a good to give him a period until his trades are processed to have a free drop period.

agree, it makes sense.

inferno31 wroteCOLON Seems fair enough. Damn this one quote thing is annoying. Mashley anything that could be done to fix that?

Lol I tried to get Scott to fix it. It kinda worked but not what was intended. I want it to be like HF where if you quote a post that has another quote in it you only quote the reply not all the other quotes. Therefore not quoting everything a hundred times. It would be nice to do that and I know there is a way. I told Scott it was "nesting" but maybe thats not it.

Ya and it would have been nice to know that you can only have 1 quote embed in the reply before you write and 10 sentences

jcarton wroteCOLONYa and it would have been nice to know that you can only have 1 quote embed in the reply before you write and 10 sentences

lol..all you do is delete (quote)(/quote) using square brackets instead of round...

You dont have to worry about losing your 10 sentences.

lol..all you do is delete (quote)(/quote) using square brackets instead of round...

You dont have to worry about losing your 10 sentences.[/quote]

ya i just figured that out after i typed that out, but we def should be able to have a few quotes on their, i think you could have at least 3 or 4 before instead of 1