Re: Playoffs Week 1
PostedCOLON Wed Mar 08, 2017 12:06 am
Day 2:
hong57 wroteCOLONanother failed .gif for me pls
Bruyns wroteCOLONBig night for my team so far. 9 points and a huge line from Gudas 1G 2A +5 4hits 1:45 SHTOI
I guess it's lousy because who cares if I won a matchup vs. CAR during the regular season? Or lost to TOR? Or whatever, if we break ties within a division I feel like looking at matchup wins h2h should come first, and then matchup wins within division. But it's not really an issue, I just didn't realize it was total matchup wins vs. anyone.kyuss wroteCOLONwhy would that be a lousy tiebreaker? it's the only point where winning matchups rather than losing them actually matters, so at least it's better than nothing...koomzzz wroteCOLONseems like a lousy tiebreaker to use IMO, but that's fine. just wanted to make sure
if anything, our lousy stuff starts right after that, with the retarded seeding system we're copying & pasting from the NHL and the fact as of now (despite fantrax would allow for it) we still can't sub injured players during playoffs week. But that's stuff for another season, maybe
personally I think that makes more sense in real life where teams indeed face each other on the ice and what a team does goes hand in hand with what the opposition allows it to do. In our case, where that doesn't happen, we like taking the bigger sample into consideration instead.koomzzz wroteCOLONI guess it's lousy because who cares if I won a matchup vs. CAR during the regular season? Or lost to TOR? Or whatever, if we break ties within a division I feel like looking at matchup wins h2h should come first, and then matchup wins within division.kyuss wroteCOLONwhy would that be a lousy tiebreaker? it's the only point where winning matchups rather than losing them actually matters, so at least it's better than nothing...koomzzz wroteCOLONseems like a lousy tiebreaker to use IMO, but that's fine. just wanted to make sure
if anything, our lousy stuff starts right after that, with the retarded seeding system we're copying & pasting from the NHL and the fact as of now (despite fantrax would allow for it) we still can't sub injured players during playoffs week. But that's stuff for another season, maybe
fair enough, i see the logic behind itkyuss wroteCOLONpersonally I think that makes more sense in real life where teams indeed face each other on the ice and what a team does goes hand in hand with what the opposition allows it to do. In our case, where that doesn't happen, we like taking the bigger sample into consideration instead.koomzzz wroteCOLONI guess it's lousy because who cares if I won a matchup vs. CAR during the regular season? Or lost to TOR? Or whatever, if we break ties within a division I feel like looking at matchup wins h2h should come first, and then matchup wins within division.kyuss wroteCOLONwhy would that be a lousy tiebreaker? it's the only point where winning matchups rather than losing them actually matters, so at least it's better than nothing...koomzzz wroteCOLONseems like a lousy tiebreaker to use IMO, but that's fine. just wanted to make sure
if anything, our lousy stuff starts right after that, with the retarded seeding system we're copying & pasting from the NHL and the fact as of now (despite fantrax would allow for it) we still can't sub injured players during playoffs week. But that's stuff for another season, maybe
Yes, I always have a chance. Not sure why my team is relevant to your match up tho.Monk wroteCOLONAwwww yeah! Bob with another shutout, when you have the best goalie in the league, you always have a chance. C'mon you Jets!!
Lol I knew somebody would pick up on that, ok maybe Bob is #2 behind Dubnyk, maybe.. but I know you had some very good weeks especially early on, but decided to go a different direction, just proves the point further thoughMatthew wroteCOLONYes, I always have a chance. Not sure why my team is relevant to your match up tho.Monk wroteCOLONAwwww yeah! Bob with another shutout, when you have the best goalie in the league, you always have a chance. C'mon you Jets!!
Yeah, I started to sabotage his stats by adding bernier. Right now depending on how the season ends it looks like dubnyk/bob/holtby all have a shot at the vezina.Monk wroteCOLONLol I knew somebody would pick up on that, ok maybe Bob is #2 behind Dubnyk, maybe.. but I know you had some very good weeks especially early on, but decided to go a different direction, just proves the point further thoughMatthew wroteCOLONYes, I always have a chance. Not sure why my team is relevant to your match up tho.Monk wroteCOLONAwwww yeah! Bob with another shutout, when you have the best goalie in the league, you always have a chance. C'mon you Jets!!
so far it's (fucking) Bob for meMatthew wroteCOLON Right now depending on how the season ends it looks like dubnyk/bob/holtby all have a shot at the vezina.
Bobs for me too, and not really close.kyuss wroteCOLONso far it's (fucking) Bob for meMatthew wroteCOLON Right now depending on how the season ends it looks like dubnyk/bob/holtby all have a shot at the vezina.