Buds Board Keepers League

Shoalzie wroteCOLONWestern Conference
Los Angeles (1) v. Nashville (8) [9-6-1]
Minnesota (2) v. St. Louis (7) [9-7-0]
Chicago (3) v. San Jose (6) [8-6-2]
Colorado (4) v. Columbus (5) [9-5-2]

Eastern Conference:
Washington (1) v. Pittsburgh (8) [8-7-1]
Boston (2) v. Buffalo (7) [10-5-1]
New Jersey (3) v. Ottawa (6) [8-7-1]
Tampa Bay (4) v. Toronto (5) [9-7-0]

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONAnyone who picked Pittsburgh over Washington either dislikes me or is retarded, likely a little bit of both.

cliff11 wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONAnyone who picked Pittsburgh over Washington either dislikes me or is retarded, likely a little bit of both.

I do like shiv more than you

Kyle wroteCOLONLos Angeles (1) v. Nashville (8)
Minnesota (2) v. St. Louis (7)
Chicago (3) v. San Jose (6)
Colorado (4) v. Columbus (5)

Eastern Conference:
Washington (1) v. Pittsburgh (8)
Boston (2) v. Buffalo (7)
New Jersey (3) v. Ottawa (6)
Tampa Bay (4) v. Toronto (5)

Scott wroteCOLONI'm not participating in this. I'm going to be too busy winning.

Scott wroteCOLONI'm not participating in this. I'm going to be too busy winning.

Mike wroteCOLONI'm sorry Scott but you put too much thought into this. Banned.

Shoalzie wroteCOLONMy three main criteria:
1. GP -- Which players had 4 game weeks vs. 3 game weeks...key in the cumulative stats.
2. Injury Strategy -- Is a team sitting a player or waiting it out with a day-to-day injury at risk of not getting anything from them at all if they don't play.
3. Goaltending -- Favorable game matchups and which goalies are playing important games and are capable of getting a shutout (usually the first team that gets a shutout will win that category).

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Shoalzie wroteCOLONMy three main criteria:
1. GP -- Which players had 4 game weeks vs. 3 game weeks...key in the cumulative stats.
2. Injury Strategy -- Is a team sitting a player or waiting it out with a day-to-day injury at risk of not getting anything from them at all if they don't play.
3. Goaltending -- Favorable game matchups and which goalies are playing important games and are capable of getting a shutout (usually the first team that gets a shutout will win that category).

And yet you picked Pittsburgh who falls short in all three categories, is a lesser team, and has NEVER beaten me during his BBKL tenure. Good pick...

Scott wroteCOLONKareem, who cares who picks who. The fact remains that your team is better then Shivs and he's shorthanded this week as well. You definitely should win this week. Actually IMO your team is probably the safest pick this week all things considered. Also more people picked Billy's team then mine which is IMO more to do with people wanting me to lose probably. With how horrible my team played last week I can't see me losing. Especially if I win the goaltending battle and the chances of that happening look good. Washington should kick it up a gear after getting shut out back to back and other then one game in the last five, Neuvirth has been on his game. I definitely like my chances this week.