Buds Board Keepers League

Your brilliance is wowing me. If only you managed a team so could demonstrate how to win...wait


No need to reply, I can do it for you:

Bold promise that'll be proved false within the year.

SuperMario wroteCOLONI would have jumped on Kessel for Hall straight in your position. I'm being a dumbass right now trying to rebuild for 2-3 years down the road. You want to win. But you want to hold Hall & your great pieces and try to acquire other Team's top pieces without giving up as much value. That gets old quick. And why you wouldn't want Kessel instead of Hall to win this year is beyond me.

Agreed, and not to harp on Taylor Hall because he is a great talent, but he wasn`t even the best player taken in 2010, Tyler Seguin and Cam Fowler were (IMO of course).

I'd still take hall #1 and fowler #2 (well #3 is where I got him, but the picks were obvious IMO).

There was a scout who said that on a pure skill level, Kessel absolutely wrecks everyone in the 2010 draft. That's where the intangibles come in -- the urge to become better, the will to win, the self-motivation -- with Kessel. I think he's growing into that, but time will tell.

As I watch Kessel this year, he seems like a very different player.

Ye kessel was way ahead of the competition pre-NHL. That really doesn't have much influence 5 years into his NHL career.

They were speaking of the 18 year old Kessel. Personally, first year NCAA players rarely dominate the competition the way Kessel did. Or Parise. Or Kariya.

Nick wroteCOLONYe kessel was way ahead of the competition pre-NHL. That really doesn't have much influence 5 years into his NHL career.

To win this year:

Kessel > Hall

This is "fact", Nick.

Nick wroteCOLONI'd still take hall #1 and fowler #2 (well #3 is where I got him, but the picks were obvious IMO).

For me, it`s:

1. Tyler Seguin (over ppg this season, with exceptional two way play, and minimal pp time)
2. Cam Fowler (hall of fame type good)
3. Taylor Hall (not a good enough shoot to be a truly elite goal scorer, which places him behind seguin and fowler imo)
4. Jeff Skinner (has done the most to date on paper, but on the ice, the above three are a clear class ahead)
5. Brandon Gormley (yeah, I think he`s going to be that good...)

Nick wroteCOLONYe kessel was way ahead of the competition pre-NHL. That really doesn't have much influence 5 years into his NHL career.

That is a convienient argument...Kessel`s pre NHL hype and production don`t have much influence on the current product, nor do the last 30 games (in the NHL) in which Kessel leads the entire NHL in scoring because Kessel is streaky.

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONThere was a scout who said that on a pure skill level, Kessel absolutely wrecks everyone in the 2010 draft. That's where the intangibles come in -- the urge to become better, the will to win, the self-motivation -- with Kessel. I think he's growing into that, but time will tell.

As I watch Kessel this year, he seems like a very different player.

You are reffering to Seidel, correct? FWIW, he isn`t the only one, Kessel`s skill-set is widely recognized among the scouting community. There were a significant portion who would have taken Kessel over Crosby if given the opportunity in 2005.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Nick wroteCOLONI'd still take hall #1 and fowler #2 (well #3 is where I got him, but the picks were obvious IMO).

For me, it`s:

1. Tyler Seguin (over ppg this season, with exceptional two way play, and minimal pp time)
2. Cam Fowler (hall of fame type good)
3. Taylor Hall (not a good enough shoot to be a truly elite goal scorer, which places him behind seguin and fowler imo)
4. Jeff Skinner (has done the most to date on paper, but on the ice, the above three are a clear class ahead)
5. Brandon Gormley (yeah, I think he`s going to be that good...)

For me:

Seguin
Hall
Skinner
Fowler

Toews kinda has that will to win thing. Ej & staal rocking out the complete player scene, backstrom with unreal offensive vision... It's an awesome draft.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONThere was a scout who said that on a pure skill level, Kessel absolutely wrecks everyone in the 2010 draft. That's where the intangibles come in -- the urge to become better, the will to win, the self-motivation -- with Kessel. I think he's growing into that, but time will tell.

As I watch Kessel this year, he seems like a very different player.

You are reffering to Seidel, correct? FWIW, he isn`t the only one, Kessel`s skill-set is widely recognized among the scouting community. There were a significant portion who would have taken Kessel over Crosby if given the opportunity in 2005.

Gimme names so I can never subscribe to their opinions in the future, please..

The Devil wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONThere was a scout who said that on a pure skill level, Kessel absolutely wrecks everyone in the 2010 draft. That's where the intangibles come in -- the urge to become better, the will to win, the self-motivation -- with Kessel. I think he's growing into that, but time will tell.

As I watch Kessel this year, he seems like a very different player.

You are reffering to Seidel, correct? FWIW, he isn`t the only one, Kessel`s skill-set is widely recognized among the scouting community. There were a significant portion who would have taken Kessel over Crosby if given the opportunity in 2005.

Gimme names so I can never subscribe to their opinions in the future, please..

LOL +1. Although Kessel is on pace for like 90+ Goals and 70+ assists right now and I hope he keeps it up.

Alright, trade me Landeskog. I surrender.

Shep wroteCOLONAlright, trade me Landeskog. I surrender.

lol for?

The Devil wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONThere was a scout who said that on a pure skill level, Kessel absolutely wrecks everyone in the 2010 draft. That's where the intangibles come in -- the urge to become better, the will to win, the self-motivation -- with Kessel. I think he's growing into that, but time will tell.

As I watch Kessel this year, he seems like a very different player.

You are reffering to Seidel, correct? FWIW, he isn`t the only one, Kessel`s skill-set is widely recognized among the scouting community. There were a significant portion who would have taken Kessel over Crosby if given the opportunity in 2005.

Gimme names so I can never subscribe to their opinions in the future, please..

Don't be an idiot...The entire scouting community was split on who the better player was, and those that preffered Crosby didn't by alot. It's no fault of the scouts, Kessel is that fucking talented. His issues are in regards to his: fitness, effort level, and attitude.

yes, however the last 6 years of training, playing and improving have left the gap to the point where it's not even worth referencing.


Dunno how often we need to be reminded that heart & commitment is a skill.



Heart won't make up for a complete lack of skill, but lack of heart will make great skill useless.

Nick wroteCOLONyes, however the last 6 years of training, playing and improving have left the gap to the point where it's not even worth referencing.


Dunno how often we need to be reminded that heart & commitment is a skill.



Heart won't make up for a complete lack of skill, but lack of heart will make great skill useless.

Who are you arguing with exactly?