Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Negotiate your trades here.
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by Robin Hood »

Mike wroteCOLON*Considers trading for a d-man he doesn't have room for out of spite*
lol that's what I thought. I owned Lidstrom for a long time. I know exactly who is willing to pay what. Competing teams don't want to give up roster value for him. Building teams don't have a use for him. And even if there is a team that wants him, cap is always an issue. No reason for a team to hold Lidstrom unless they have a very good chance of winning this year.
Image
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by bills09 »

doesnt mean im gonna give him to you for 2 2nds and a meh prospect....
Image
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by MSP4LYFE »

Wow...Greg Mckegg is getting no love in this thread.
Image
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by bills09 »

its not that I dont like McKegg, but to say McKegg+2nd '12+2nd '13 is a great offer for Nick Lidstrom is laughable.
Image
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by Robin Hood »

bills09 wroteCOLONdoesnt mean im gonna give him to you for 2 2nds and a meh prospect....
You are going to get to the deadline next year and realize that TBL, WSH, TOR, BOS, LAK, COL, STL, SJS, VAN will not want to give you a roster player for lidstrom. They will end up offering prospects + picks and the prospects will not be as good as McKegg/or the picks will not be as good. I know this because I held Lidstrom close to the deadline last year. Adding 6.2M in the middle of the year requires cap manipulation by a team to the point where too many pieces need to be moved. Not to mention a lot of teams (including myself) will more than likely get their asses kicked by teams like TOR, TBL, BOS, COL, STL. That huge risk is not worth paying drastically for a one year player. Shep landed Selanne for Jurco. My offer for Lidstrom is just as good if not better. Scott/Kareem/Steve are probably the only other ones who'd give ya value for him but Scott's got his Knights and I dont think Kareem and Steve have the cap room.

But the worst part about this thread is that Lidstrom's valuation is being ridiculed when no one will more than likely make a better offer. And McKegg's being made out to be a joke. If you look at the trade history for what 2nd round picks sold for this year, things went full retard like they always do.

But if you manage to get more, hats off to you man.
Image
User avatar
kimmer
PostsCOLON 18090
JoinedCOLON Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario, Canada

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by kimmer »

SuperMario wroteCOLON
bills09 wroteCOLONdoesnt mean im gonna give him to you for 2 2nds and a meh prospect....
You are going to get to the deadline next year and realize that TBL, WSH, TOR, BOS, LAK, COL, STL, SJS, VAN will not want to give you a roster player for lidstrom. They will end up offering prospects + picks and the prospects will not be as good as McKegg/or the picks will not be as good. I know this because I held Lidstrom close to the deadline last year. Adding 6.2M in the middle of the year requires cap manipulation by a team to the point where too many pieces need to be moved. Not to mention a lot of teams (including myself) will more than likely get their asses kicked by teams like TOR, TBL, BOS, COL, STL. That huge risk is not worth paying drastically for a one year player. Shep landed Selanne for Jurco. My offer for Lidstrom is just as good if not better. Scott/Kareem/Steve are probably the only other ones who'd give ya value for him but Scott's got his Knights and I dont think Kareem and Steve have the cap room.

But the worst part about this thread is that Lidstrom's valuation is being ridiculed when no one will more than likely make a better offer. And McKegg's being made out to be a joke. If you look at the trade history for what 2nd round picks sold for this year, things went full retard like they always do.

But if you manage to get more, hats off to you man.
Very nice explanation, however, this is the offseason
User avatar
Shep
PostsCOLON 13901
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by Shep »

Selanne isn't even signed and coming off knee surgery.
Inaugural GM
[STL] 2009 - 2016
[PHI] 2019 -
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by bills09 »

SuperMario wroteCOLON
bills09 wroteCOLONdoesnt mean im gonna give him to you for 2 2nds and a meh prospect....
You are going to get to the deadline next year and realize that TBL, WSH, TOR, BOS, LAK, COL, STL, SJS, VAN will not want to give you a roster player for lidstrom. They will end up offering prospects + picks and the prospects will not be as good as McKegg/or the picks will not be as good. I know this because I held Lidstrom close to the deadline last year. Adding 6.2M in the middle of the year requires cap manipulation by a team to the point where too many pieces need to be moved. Not to mention a lot of teams (including myself) will more than likely get their asses kicked by teams like TOR, TBL, BOS, COL, STL. That huge risk is not worth paying drastically for a one year player. Shep landed Selanne for Jurco. My offer for Lidstrom is just as good if not better. Scott/Kareem/Steve are probably the only other ones who'd give ya value for him but Scott's got his Knights and I dont think Kareem and Steve have the cap room.

But the worst part about this thread is that Lidstrom's valuation is being ridiculed when no one will more than likely make a better offer. And McKegg's being made out to be a joke. If you look at the trade history for what 2nd round picks sold for this year, things went full retard like they always do.

But if you manage to get more, hats off to you man.
meh ill keep him then
Image
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by MSP4LYFE »

bills09 wroteCOLONits not that I dont like McKegg, but to say McKegg+2nd '12+2nd '13 is a great offer for Nick Lidstrom is laughable.
You just labeled him a "meh prospect"...
Image
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by MSP4LYFE »

SuperMario wroteCOLON
bills09 wroteCOLONdoesnt mean im gonna give him to you for 2 2nds and a meh prospect....
You are going to get to the deadline next year and realize that TBL, WSH, TOR, BOS, LAK, COL, STL, SJS, VAN will not want to give you a roster player for lidstrom. They will end up offering prospects + picks and the prospects will not be as good as McKegg/or the picks will not be as good. I know this because I held Lidstrom close to the deadline last year. Adding 6.2M in the middle of the year requires cap manipulation by a team to the point where too many pieces need to be moved. Not to mention a lot of teams (including myself) will more than likely get their asses kicked by teams like TOR, TBL, BOS, COL, STL. That huge risk is not worth paying drastically for a one year player. Shep landed Selanne for Jurco. My offer for Lidstrom is just as good if not better. Scott/Kareem/Steve are probably the only other ones who'd give ya value for him but Scott's got his Knights and I dont think Kareem and Steve have the cap room.

But the worst part about this thread is that Lidstrom's valuation is being ridiculed when no one will more than likely make a better offer. And McKegg's being made out to be a joke. If you look at the trade history for what 2nd round picks sold for this year, things went full retard like they always do.

But if you manage to get more, hats off to you man.
As much as it pains me to say this, I concur.
Image
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by bills09 »

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON
bills09 wroteCOLONits not that I dont like McKegg, but to say McKegg+2nd '12+2nd '13 is a great offer for Nick Lidstrom is laughable.
You just labeled him a "meh prospect"...
technically he is a meh prospect as in hes not a great prospect, nor is he a shit one.
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by Nick »

'meh' is below 'medium' in my vocab.
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by MSP4LYFE »

facey wroteCOLON'meh' is below 'medium' in my vocab.
Same
Image
User avatar
Mike
Test 2
PostsCOLON 11390
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 7:08 pm

Re: Gregg McKegg for a D-Man

Post by Mike »

"Meh" to me means not an absolute steal at 62nd overall. Good pick, absolutely, but no steal.
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to