Page 2 of 2
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:23 pm
by Handsome&FairMike
Hedman for Rielly + Kaskisuo+ 3rd for steve
Turned into: Henrique for Tanev + Pulock + Jooris + Jordan + 1st for me
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:27 pm
by lightupdadarkness
Does Pulock have to be protected?
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:29 pm
by The BBKL Insider
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDoes Pulock have to be protected?
Yes, unfortunately
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:30 pm
by Matthew
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDoes Pulock have to be protected?
Given he will have played games in either his 4th AHL season or 2nd NHL season after next year, I'd think he does. But we need to see what the NHL finalizes.
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:31 pm
by Handsome&FairMike
lightupdadarkness wroteCOLONDoes Pulock have to be protected?
methinks so... why I was humming and hawing on it... will figure it all out by the time we have to expose guys.
I really think this will help parity in the league... funny how adding one team does that. But you will get good players exposed for cheap, exposure exempt prospects at a reasonable price. More lower teams with those assets will get good players who other teams don't want to lose for nothing. May in the end not help the expansion team, but they'll slowly come into form. Can't protect everyone.
Also, I'm curious as to what's gonna happen with the draft... what % odds will the expansion team get?
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:32 pm
by Matthew
I've heard they will get similar odds to the 4th last team.
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:34 pm
by lightupdadarkness
heard that rumor as well
Re: LAK - PIT
PostedCOLON Tue Jun 21, 2016 10:52 pm
by bills09
Would rather Pietrangelo than the package Pitt received therefore I like it for Steve