DAL/PHX/VAN

Trades that have been confirmed on the forum and have been reviewed and processed by the league are moved here.
anton
PostsCOLON 7111
JoinedCOLON Mon May 10, 2010 10:03 pm
LocationCOLON Orange County

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by anton »

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONHey, not saying it wasn't a fair deal, but giving up Colborne as well? Heh. We both know the resell value on that one. And since when does Shiv know what he's doing? lol
nino + colborne for clowe is a very sound offer for anyone trying to immediately improve their team.

this, on the other hand, reeks of frank - taking 1 piece of good value and turning it into 4 or 5 with little.
Chris
PostsCOLON 3619
JoinedCOLON Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Chris »

To Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Robin Hood »

schenn>brassard + like 5 prospects> connolly> pominville> kessel>grabovski + oshie>richards + simmonds> zetterberg + marleau

with prospects left to spare from what you sent me for Schenn. So please don't criticize my GMing ;).
Image
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Robin Hood »

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONTo Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
Ask any GM in this league, your team is far worse than what you started with.
Image
Chris
PostsCOLON 3619
JoinedCOLON Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Chris »

Wish I could get a snapshot of the team I had before I took over it. From what I read and discussed, Bergey, Tony, Mash, and a handful of others did the peripheral build with few high upside pieces after seeing everyone was going after scorers. To my recollection, Vancouver had Oleksiak, Granlund (who I think is complete and utter shit), Bennett, Couture, and MAF as the core pieces going forward.

Now, I have Schenn, Wilson, Nino, OEL, Poulin, Strome, Miller, B. Smith, Morrow, and many others who are near locks to be pretty good players or better. Not sure how I fucked up. Meanwhile, you actually tried to tank -- and failed at that if that's even possible. I get it. People want to win here. I want a dynasty. Simple as that.

And heh, yea, let's pretend that Vancouver remotely had close to the teams that Steve, Nick, Scott, and others had before I took over. Yup, he was going to win this year.
Chris
PostsCOLON 3619
JoinedCOLON Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Chris »

SuperMario wroteCOLON
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONTo Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
Ask any GM in this league, your team is far worse than what you started with.
Ask any GM in this league: none of you didn't disagree when I said that Vancouver wasn't a team that could contend without high quality pieces.
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Robin Hood »

Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLON
SuperMario wroteCOLON
Cuntacular Chris wroteCOLONTo Shiv's post: Wait, what? I intentionally tore it down, and building up with a variety of different high-upside pieces; something that was completely absent on the Canucks (save for Couture and Seidenberg) when I took over it.
Ask any GM in this league, your team is far worse than what you started with.
Ask any GM in this league: none of you didn't disagree when I said that Vancouver wasn't a team that could contend without high quality pieces.
I'll let Kareem/Anton take this one so that it doesn't sound like I'm biased ;).
Image
Chris
PostsCOLON 3619
JoinedCOLON Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Chris »

Of course you would. Kareem was one of those who agreed. And to my recollection, you did too. Quite tired of the hypocrisy. I'm going to bed. Good night.
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by MSP4LYFE »

Chris, you are out of your mind if you think Shiv ever wanted to tank...It`s not difficult to assemble a terrible team.

As for the Vancouver team of past and present, I`m not touching that one with a ten foot pole.
Image
anton
PostsCOLON 7111
JoinedCOLON Mon May 10, 2010 10:03 pm
LocationCOLON Orange County

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by anton »

Vancouver was a very underrated/under the radar team when Chris took over. I can understand how it would be difficult for a new GM to come in and immediately appreciate what he had, but to say your team has a better outlook now than it had then is absolutely false.

You havent done a terrible job by any stretch, but I wouldn't be bragging about what you've accomplished either.
User avatar
Shep
PostsCOLON 13901
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by Shep »

I think you all need to get in a room together, have a bukkake with Frank and be done with it.
Inaugural GM
[STL] 2009 - 2016
[PHI] 2019 -
User avatar
kimmer
PostsCOLON 18090
JoinedCOLON Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario, Canada

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by kimmer »

Shep wroteCOLONI think you all need to get in a room together, have a bukkake with Frank and be done with it.
Somebody is into Japanese pr0n
User avatar
foolama
PostsCOLON 106
JoinedCOLON Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:33 pm

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by foolama »

i enjoy the blurred naughty bits...makes my imagination tingle......
Image
User avatar
kimmer
PostsCOLON 18090
JoinedCOLON Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario, Canada

Re: DAL/PHX/VAN

Post by kimmer »

LOOOOOOL
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to