Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Anything goes here OT stuff is OK too!
User avatar
Shep
PostsCOLON 13901
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Shep »

The Carter deal was good. This one, not so much.
Inaugural GM
[STL] 2009 - 2016
[PHI] 2019 -
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Robin Hood »

What the fuck is going on?
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Nick »

Dynamite is blowing up Shiv, that's what it does.
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Robin Hood »

These two trades are going to set the Flyers back nicely. Well done Philly. Holmgren is going to get fired this season. Any bet takers?
Image
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by MSP4LYFE »

That is an exaggeration.
Image
User avatar
Shep
PostsCOLON 13901
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Shep »

Philly will have NO problem making the playoffs this year.

People that think they're fucked are insane.
Inaugural GM
[STL] 2009 - 2016
[PHI] 2019 -
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Nick »

Shep wroteCOLONPhilly will have NO problem making the playoffs this year.

People that think they're fucked are insane.

They still have an insane forward lineup, not like they traded their #1 scorer.


Voracek - Giroux - JvR
Hartnell - Briere - Leino*
Simmonds - Schenn - Versteeg

not issues there....D is still top 3 in the league, and they now have a 'les git' tender.... I wouldn't have moved Richards, but not like they're anything other then contenders.
User avatar
kyuss
PostsCOLON 14876
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by kyuss »

Image

the two trades separately, i would have got it..

but when i read about Richards right after closing the page about the Carter deal..
well, i wondered if today was april 1st.
User avatar
Tony
PostsCOLON 11222
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm
LocationCOLON Nevada

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Tony »

Briere + Hartnell > Richards + Carter? Just dumb ...
Image
Click banner to view current roster and picks
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Robin Hood »

Shep wroteCOLONPhilly will have NO problem making the playoffs this year.

People that think they're fucked are insane.
making the playoffs is never an issue for philly. this is a huge mistake. they were about a move away from being cup favourites. they are now again a 4-5 seed. does anyone think that team can beat Pittsburgh? Vancouver? Boston? Washington? Tampa Bay? lol La?
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Nick »

Briere + Hartnell + Coach + Pronger > Carter + Richards?

even then... I dunno...
does anyone think that team can beat Pittsburgh? Vancouver? Boston? Washington? Tampa Bay? lol La?
Yes.
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Robin Hood »

I'm going to be captain obvious and point out who in terms of BBKL this just helped:

1) Scott - Mason in net. Nash up front lol.
2) Mike - Quick in net
3) Matt - Carter #1 C in CBJ
4) Unknown GM who owns the forward Philly will sign
5) Doughty, Penner, Johnson owners.
Image
User avatar
Robin Hood
PostsCOLON 13589
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Robin Hood »

facey wroteCOLON
does anyone think that team can beat Pittsburgh? Vancouver? Boston? Washington? Tampa Bay? lol La?
Yes.
This team will not be able to beat Pittsburgh/Washington/Tampa/Boston to come out of the east for at least two years.
Image
User avatar
Arian The Insider
PostsCOLON 7304
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Arian The Insider »

voracek is going to explode in philly
Click Oilers image below for full team roster
Image
User avatar
fedro91
PostsCOLON 1473
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:44 pm
LocationCOLON Gatineau,Quebec
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by fedro91 »

facey wroteCOLON
Shep wroteCOLONPhilly will have NO problem making the playoffs this year.

People that think they're fucked are insane.

They still have an insane forward lineup, not like they traded their #1 scorer.


Voracek - Giroux - JvR
Hartnell - Briere - Leino*
Simmonds - Schenn - Versteeg

not issues there....D is still top 3 in the league, and they now have a 'les git' tender.... I wouldn't have moved Richards, but not like they're anything other then contenders.
I actually I bet that Schenn will be a top 2 Center for sure. So those line are incorect.
Image

By the way Thx for the sig....
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by MSP4LYFE »

fedro91 wroteCOLONI actually I bet that Schenn will be a top 2 Center for sure. So those line are incorect.
I concur, you don't trade away your best player for someone you project as a future third line center. Whether Schenn starts in the top 6 to begin the season, or later on, I don't know, but it will happen at some point. That much should be obvious.
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Nick »

Well... lots of people refer to the Briere line as the 3rd line, in that sense Simmonds-Schenn-Steeg is the 2nd... Dany's 18min toi indicates otherwise.
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by MSP4LYFE »

facey wroteCOLONWell... lots of people refer to the Briere line as the 3rd line, in that sense Simmonds-Schenn-Steeg is the 2nd... Dany's 18min toi indicates otherwise.
It was referred to the third line because: Carter, Giroux and Richards (who played on separate lines) had as many, if not more minutes per game. That is obviously no longer the case.
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by Nick »

Richards had 18:52/game with 2min's shorthand, and actually the least of everyone we're talking about even strength.
Crater had less toi/game and played short handed (18:14, 40second SH, for Jeff versus 18:18 that Dany played none of which shorthanded)
Giroux lead forward in TOI by a fair margin, leading their forwards in PP and SH, however Dany led the team in EV toi.


Anyways, the suggestion that Grioux moves anywhere but the the #1 centre role, that he by all indications had already, or that Briere somehow loses toi, is simply wrong. Sure perhaps in 1-2 years they project Schenn to be playing a big role, but saying he's already earned a top 6 role seems out to lunch to me.
User avatar
hong57
PostsCOLON 7106
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Mike Richards traded to Los Angeles

Post by hong57 »

i like it as clifford owner, who is centreing LA's 3rd line? Stoll?
Image
#91 - John Tavares
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to