I Want To Switch Conferences

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:31 pm

mr. bruin wroteCOLONoic...regular season you speak of. yes, yes indeed, that is a fact.

At least I was the best at something lol

Post by **KapG** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:51 am

Shoalzie wroteCOLONMy overall feelings on this is either keep things the way they are or essentially re-draft the franchises and allow everyone to pick their NHL team over again. Make the draft in the order of finish this season with the #1 team (Scott) choose his team and so on until I pick from the last two and Lee gets the last team available. Then, have that be our league going forward. We need to stop the annual talk of Team A wants to move to another conference. If there truly is imbalance, allow everyone to pick where they feel comfortable and we essentially start with new teams but keep the same players. Let's either do mass re-alignment or none at all.

So everyone keeps the same rosters that they currently have? Is that what you are getting at here shoalzie? I'm sure it's as simple as that I just want to clarify since I only got 2 hours sleep today and it feels like there is a cloud in my head (just LOVE school assignments /sarcasm)

Post by **Shoalzie** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:33 am

Yeah...I'm not suggesting we start completely from scratch. (however...it would do me well.

) Let's all re-draft for team identities and it would essentially allow us to pick where we want to play. At this point, none of our teams really have the makeup of our original teams anyway. If we're set on our 30 GMs, let's just take the time and have everyone pick again who they want to be and it will serve as our mass realignment.

I'm going to assume each of the top teams would prefer to not have to be in the same division so I don't think the top 4 or 5 picks would automatically take teams in the same division. Or we can set something up where every six picks must go into seperate divisions. Picks 1-6 choose a team in each division and the 7-12 pick a second team in each division and so on.

But if this is something we do...then the talk of realignment must never be brought up again. This is it!

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:53 am

That would be ideal Shoalzie, but it is near impossible because of all the admin work that would need to go into it...

Post by **The BBKL Insider** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:55 am

the most ideal is just to leave everything as is!

anton · Post by **anton** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:56 am

sgupca wroteCOLONthe most ideal is just to leave everything as is!

Post by **Shoalzie** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:34 pm

sgupca wroteCOLONthe most ideal is just to leave everything as is!

Between that and my idea...I'd rather things just stay the way they are also. I just would like us to get to a point where relocation/realignment is a dead issue for the future.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:53 pm

Shoalzie wroteCOLON
sgupca wroteCOLONthe most ideal is just to leave everything as is!

Between that and my idea...I'd rather things just stay the way they are also. I just would like us to get to a point where relocation/realignment is a dead issue for the future.

Your first point contradicts your second. If you want relocation/re-alignment to be a dead issue you cannot support the status-quo, as the status quo is not a dead issue. Not even close.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:15 pm

Bump

Still want to change conferences, make it happen CC.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:16 pm

We will shuffle up when the NHL does

the name changing fiasco and people wanting to switch is just ugly...no to one and no to all.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:16 pm

FREE WASHINGTON!

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:17 pm

facey wroteCOLONWe will shuffle up when the NHL does the name changing fiasco and people wanting to switch is just ugly...no to one and no to all.

Something has to give, and since I have yet to see a reasonable attempt made at balancing the schedule, this is the only alternative.

tyler · Post by **tyler** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:36 pm

washington is a eastern team, why in the hell would it be put in the west.

MSP4LYFE · Post by **MSP4LYFE** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:44 pm

bergey wroteCOLONwashington is a eastern team, why in the hell would it be put in the west.

That's why you switch teams you fucking tool.

Post by **Shoalzie** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:07 pm

I think a more urgent matter is getting Luke get switched over to Winnipeg from Atlanta.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:14 pm

Shoalzie wroteCOLONI think a more urgent matter is getting Luke get switched over to Winnipeg from Atlanta.

That's nothing more then a name change.

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:41 pm

facey wroteCOLON
Shoalzie wroteCOLONI think a more urgent matter is getting Luke get switched over to Winnipeg from Atlanta.
That's nothing more then a name change.

B-I-N-G-O

shooker · Post by **shooker** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:28 am

Ughh I thought we were done we this lol.

Post by **KapG** » Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:46 am

like in real life sports. conferences are often unbalanced.

Post by **Shep** » Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:48 am

The only reason Billy and I switched was to get the correct 30 NHL teams back into this and eliminate Hartford.

Buds Board Keepers League

I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences

Re: I Want To Switch Conferences