PIT/COL OH YEAH!

[Nick]

Dallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited

[shooker]

Dallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited

pretty funny that comes out right after the trade. Regardless of where he goes I think I made the right move.

[Robin Hood]

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf

If Richards becomes a Maple Leaf, I will officially have my FIRST untradeable asset.

hahahaha

Scott you shouldn't be laughing after your Knights fiasco. You're worse than I am. But in this Richards case, you will see how that guy stays my #1 Center if he is the Leafs #1 Center.

[Robin Hood]

Dallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited

omg omg omg
http://dallas.sbnation.com/dallas-stars ... rds-a-deal

[MSP4LYFE]

Dallas has said they won't be offering Richards a contract... time to get excited

Not really, this has been known for more than a month now. In fact I specifically recall having this exact conversation with you, and remarking (definitively) that Dallas ownership had given up on the pursuit of Richards.

Still, these are, as you alluded too, exciting times. Save for the SCF debacle...Obviously.

[Scott]

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf

If Richards becomes a Maple Leaf, I will officially have my FIRST untradeable asset.

hahahaha

Scott you shouldn't be laughing after your Knights fiasco. You're worse than I am. But in this Richards case, you will see how that guy stays my #1 Center if he is the Leafs #1 Center.

I don't get it.. what fiasco? I'm worse then you at exactly what? Saying someone's untouchable and then trading them?

[MSP4LYFE]

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf

That's a negative imo

How so?

[Scott]

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf

That's a negative imo

How so?

Because Richards will become Shiv's FIRST untradeable asset of course..

[Robin Hood]

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf

That's a negative imo

How so?

Because Richards will become Shiv's FIRST untradeable asset of course..

.

[Scott]

I'm surprised no one else has mentioned the obvious plus on Shiv's side of the deal, he added a future Maple Leaf

That's a negative imo

How so?

Because Richards will become Shiv's FIRST untradeable asset of course..

.

You still didn't answer my question

I don't get it.. what fiasco? I'm worse then you at exactly what? Saying someone's untouchable and then trading them?

[Robin Hood]

Oh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.

[Scott]

Oh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.

No, I 100% don't.. please give me these answers I should know..

[shooker]

Oh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.

No, I 100% don't.. please give me these answers I should know..

sounds similar to that whole hockeydb thing shiv. I know your frustration in having to explain the obvious

[Shep]

[Nick]

that is disgusting. not happy with you shep, not happy at all.

[Scott]

Oh I just ignored your post because you know the answers to those questions already.

No, I 100% don't.. please give me these answers I should know..

sounds similar to that whole hockeydb thing shiv. I know your frustration in having to explain the obvious

The hockeydb thing was weak and retarded.. I don't understand stupidity lol.

I just think you guys won't explain what you guys mean because you know it isn't factual. If it was, you'd both be quick to explain it..

[MSP4LYFE]

I don't understand stupidity lol.

Would you like an example or definition?

[Scott]

I don't understand stupidity lol.

Would you like an example or definition?

haha, good one

[Scott]

But what I really want is for Bry and Shiv to explain to me what they meant by their respective allegations.. I seriously do not get what they meant.

Bryan told me you'd get it Kareem.. maybe you can enlighten me?

[Nick]

Holy... not rocket science; your a stats watcher yada yada.