Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Josh Manson just traded to Colorado with a 10 hit game all ready there is potentially available
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
I'm here for you
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Damn we should just let the deadline go til 7 this was fun-ish haha
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Worst deadline I have ever been a part of
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
yup, deals getting accepted only after the deadline passed is the worst...
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
extend by another week would be funMatthew wroteCOLONDamn we should just let the deadline go til 7 this was fun-ish haha
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
+1Da_Hawks wroteCOLONWorst deadline I have ever been a part of
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Should be a short winners and losers list
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
We need cap accumulation and retention
-
- PostsCOLON 4810
- JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
- LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Who’s gonna volunteer to keep track of that :SDa_Hawks wroteCOLONWe need cap accumulation and retention
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Scotty will figure it out!Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONWho’s gonna volunteer to keep track of that :SDa_Hawks wroteCOLONWe need cap accumulation and retention
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
The main problem is these days it feels like we have half the league not showing up on deadline day.
Adding cap retention can't do that match if the GMs of the teams with cap space don't bother coming online for the trade deadline.
So that's the first thing to look at imo.
That said, cap retention can help active GMs reaching deals and with the stuff Scott has going on Googledocs (and googledocs is what we use for cap purposes anyway) combined with the smaller amount of transactions than we had back in the day, we might actually have a chance at implementing that at this time if the league wants to and Scott cares enough about it.
Adding cap retention can't do that match if the GMs of the teams with cap space don't bother coming online for the trade deadline.
So that's the first thing to look at imo.
That said, cap retention can help active GMs reaching deals and with the stuff Scott has going on Googledocs (and googledocs is what we use for cap purposes anyway) combined with the smaller amount of transactions than we had back in the day, we might actually have a chance at implementing that at this time if the league wants to and Scott cares enough about it.
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
The cap is going to begin going up so there will be more space to work with in coming years
It's been harder to make deals the last couple years due to flat cap
It's been harder to make deals the last couple years due to flat cap
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
-
- PostsCOLON 4810
- JoinedCOLON Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
- LocationCOLON Wolfville, NS
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
Scott already does so much unpaid work - last thing I want to do is add work for him. We should honestly be giving him a stipend.Da_Hawks wroteCOLONScotty will figure it out!Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONWho’s gonna volunteer to keep track of that :SDa_Hawks wroteCOLONWe need cap accumulation and retention
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
I brought this idea up with the CC and we've been talking about it internally.
With this year's sheet, I went ahead and I've already made salaries as a value that can be dynamic week-to-week just like I do for rosters and positions and waiver status.
If you trade someone and you retain 50%, I can make their salary half for the balance of the season and it won't screw up previous weeks. I'd just need to create some kind of retention "asset" that the other team will have on their sheet so that retained amount goes towards their cap. I'd probably add a box on the sheet that tracks retained salary.
Essentially, the retained salary would remain for the balance of the player's current contract.
With this year's sheet, I went ahead and I've already made salaries as a value that can be dynamic week-to-week just like I do for rosters and positions and waiver status.
If you trade someone and you retain 50%, I can make their salary half for the balance of the season and it won't screw up previous weeks. I'd just need to create some kind of retention "asset" that the other team will have on their sheet so that retained amount goes towards their cap. I'd probably add a box on the sheet that tracks retained salary.
Essentially, the retained salary would remain for the balance of the player's current contract.
- Shoalzie
- PostsCOLON 12673
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
- LocationCOLON Portland, MI
- CONTACTCOLON
Re: Anaheim DEADLINE BLOCK
The other reason I made salaries dynamic is for a situation like Evander Kane...a player that starts the year under an existing deal, they are either bought out or terminated during the season and then they sign a new deal with a different salary.