Career Win %

[hong57]

Thanks Dave, love you!

[hong57]

im actually trending downwards haha..
and surprised paul didn't have a season with winning% <0.2 =P

[CAM]

Neat stuff. Question though, is it wrong to take the average of the total win % each year? Im just thinking the switch to playing 4 matches potentially skews the out put. If a team was super good the year we switched it would weight the totals.

[CAM]

For example, the average for me would be 0.574% and Matt would be 0.541%. i just used closest team in list to mine.

Statistically, i would assume taking the average of the win % since inception is more realistic to account for the matchup changes. Maybe it doesnt even matter? What if all those colums were just divided by 4…?

[Da_Hawks]

My win% is going to be really bad for a long time haha. Nice spreadsheet!

[Matthew]

Seems wrong when only 7 teams over .500 and that many teams below .400 with only 2 teams over .600

[dave1959]

should I exclude ties?

[Arian The Insider]

Seems wrong when only 7 teams over .500 and that many teams below .400 with only 2 teams over .600

Includes ties so it can't be compared to a .500 record we see in real life sports (e.g. 35-35-12)

[dave1959]

So, I have added all current GMs to the TAB

including Final Conference Standings each year, and playoff record


(there are 7 of us that have never made the playoffs)

[thom54]

So, I have added all current GMs to the TAB

including Final Conference Standings each year, and playoff record


(there are 7 of us that have never made the playoffs)

Paul’s ears are burning

[Matthew]

Seems wrong when only 7 teams over .500 and that many teams below .400 with only 2 teams over .600

Includes ties so it can't be compared to a .500 record we see in real life sports (e.g. 35-35-12)

Ties in our format added or bot added still does not affect the .500

[dave1959]

of course it does

the way I did it

Wins divided by Wins+Losses+Ties
so say 10W 11L 3T = 10/24 = .416 win %

if you take out ties

it would be 10/21 = .476 win %

[thom54]

well then a tie is counted as a loss, where it should be a 50% of a win , no?

[dave1959]

ok

so I changed the formula to add 1/2 ties

changed the initial thread post to GMs instead of Team

[Matthew]

If you add up every teams record it should equal to .500, since in every matchup there are 32 points awarded between 2 teams. Being equally over and under .500 no matter if there are ties or not.

[The BBKL Insider]

That's an incredible amount of work Dave! Thanks!

[Arian The Insider]

If you add up every teams record it should equal to .500, since in every matchup there are 32 points awarded between 2 teams. Being equally over and under .500 no matter if there are ties or not.

Are you looking at the GM records? It doesn't have every year for every team.

[dave1959]

If you add up every teams record it should equal to .500, since in every matchup there are 32 points awarded between 2 teams. Being equally over and under .500 no matter if there are ties or not.

Are you looking at the GM records? It doesn't have every year for every team.

Right.... I only did current GMs.

I don't give a fuck about the quitters

[hong57]

by GM

(for total scoring category W-L-T)

4 David-Minnesota (Hong)-2010 0.632

I should be 2009 too I'm one of the very few original Gms like steve mike billy arian and whoever i left out

[hong57]

by GM

(for total scoring category W-L-T)

4 David-Minnesota (Hong)-2010 0.632

I should be 2009 too I'm one of the very few original Gms like steve mike billy luke and whoever i left out