Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Anything goes here OT stuff is OK too!
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by bills09 »

Image
User avatar
bma
PostsCOLON 2282
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:44 pm

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by bma »

Wow, that would be insane.
Click banner for full assets/roster
Image
GM Achievements:
2013/14 - WC Quarterfinalist (Colorado Avalanche)
2012/13 - BBKL Finalist and WC Champion (Columbus Blue Jackets)
2011/12 - WC Semi-Finalist (Columbus Blue Jackets)
User avatar
inferno31
PostsCOLON 1805
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:15 pm
LocationCOLON NYC

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by inferno31 »

Not sure what to think. The teachers never really didn't give enough money to the leafs, so not sure what'll change there. Maybe Rogers brings in someone better with a sports pedigree, but seems like the pension plan has had little involvement in the day to day running of the raptors of the leafs in the past few years.

Only impact then is I have to put up with shitty sportsnet stuff for every game.. well that'd suck.
Roster
Image
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by bills09 »

id imagine bob mckenzie and the tsn crew would be offered nice cushy sportsnet jobs.
Image
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by Nick »

Monopoly is a fun game.
User avatar
MSP4LYFE
PostsCOLON 11503
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 4:22 pm
LocationCOLON Mississauga, Ontario
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by MSP4LYFE »

I hope this doesn't happen, it's never a good thing for any organization to own such a high concentration of a product, should this go through Rogers would essentially monopolize the Toronto Sports Market. That would mean the end of TSN Maple Leaf broadcasts, perhaps even the end of TSN, increased costs to watch sPNET, more specialized channels, and perhaps even a centralized PPV channel for Toronto sports. The only incentive is that their would be greater motivation to ice a winner, since good teams draw higher ratings than poor ones.
Image
bills09
PostsCOLON 9280
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:10 pm
LocationCOLON Pickering, Ontario

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by bills09 »

they still dont own the argos
































yet
Image
User avatar
inferno31
PostsCOLON 1805
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 5:15 pm
LocationCOLON NYC

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by inferno31 »

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONI hope this doesn't happen, it's never a good thing for any organization to own such a high concentration of a product, should this go through Rogers would essentially monopolize the Toronto Sports Market. That would mean the end of TSN Maple Leaf broadcasts, perhaps even the end of TSN, increased costs to watch sPNET, more specialized channels, and perhaps even a centralized PPV channel for Toronto sports. The only incentive is that their would be greater motivation to ice a winner, since good teams draw higher ratings than poor ones.
I imagine they'd set it up like MSG does, which would be its own special TV package etc. Yeah in that sense it would suck, and it would likely make TSN focus on all other markets outside of Toronto. Not sure if they'd do anything to make the leafs a winner though, the leafs have the money in recent years that hasn't been whats holding us back.

I always wanted the teachers to sell, but.. not like this.
Roster
Image
User avatar
Mike
Test 2
PostsCOLON 11390
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 7:08 pm

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by Mike »

Ugh... old boss/new boss.

I wish we had a Leonsis.
User avatar
Mike
Test 2
PostsCOLON 11390
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 7:08 pm

Re: Rogers in Talks to buy MLSE

Post by Mike »

Edit: more importantly, this doesn't bode well for the possibility of another NHL franchise in southern Ontario. Unfortunate...
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to