NHL Transactions, Injuries & Rumours

[thom54]

did someone say rat ?

[koomzzz]

da phuck

[Tony]

Looks more like a turd

[hong57]

https://www.fanragsports.com/nhl/nhl-tr ... n-arrived/

interesting.. seems hammer more likely being move than seabrook

[Bruyns]

That Seabrook contract is terrible.

[CasperX22]

That Seabrook contract is terrible.

Yep. It's pretty bad.

[Loki]

Hjalmarsson is certainly easier to move considering he's actually good and not on an awful deal

[hong57]

ya but hammer is on a reasonable cap and 4 mil doesn't help much really...

[hong57]

yes .. some bad contract for sure.. seabrook's contract is quite unmovable but they somehow gonna do it.. surprise someone wanna take kruger

[hong57]

if leafs grab hammer i will cry.. i wan a leafs player on my roster

[timwebb1212]

I have no idea why Chicago would move Hjammer. Making 4 mil? Absolute steal. For a team with cap issues, trading top pair dmen making 4mil just doesn't seem like a smart move.

[CasperX22]

I have no idea why Chicago would move Hjammer. Making 4 mil? Absolute steal. For a team with cap issues, trading top pair dmen making 4mil just doesn't seem like a smart move.

Bc guys like Seabrook have immovable contracts. In addition to a lot of bad contracts they have a bunch of nmc's. They have to cut cap.

[hong57]

can they buy out someone?

[hong57]

but good to see chicago's time is up

[Robin Hood]

That Seabrook contract is terrible.

Yep. It's pretty bad.

Won 3 cups on it. Not really that terrible.

[Bruyns]

That Seabrook contract is terrible.

Yep. It's pretty bad.

Won 3 cups on it. Not really that terrible.

lol they have won 0 cups with it, he just finished his first season of a 8 year deal and he is 32. It's probably in the top 10 for bad contracts depending on how steep his decline is.

[CasperX22]

That Seabrook contract is terrible.

Yep. It's pretty bad.

Won 3 cups on it. Not really that terrible.

lol they have won 0 cups with it, he just finished his first season of a 8 year deal and he is 32. It's probably in the top 10 for bad contracts depending on how steep his decline is.

What Matt said. There was literally no reason for them to hand out such a massive contract to him on the back-end of his career. Can't hand out multiple contracts like that when you have Toews and Kane making the kind of money they are.

[timwebb1212]

That Seabrook contract is terrible.

Yep. It's pretty bad.

Won 3 cups on it. Not really that terrible.

lol they have won 0 cups with it, he just finished his first season of a 8 year deal and he is 32. It's probably in the top 10 for bad contracts depending on how steep his decline is.

This. Terrible contract.

[timwebb1212]

I have no idea why Chicago would move Hjammer. Making 4 mil? Absolute steal. For a team with cap issues, trading top pair dmen making 4mil just doesn't seem like a smart move.

Bc guys like Seabrook have immovable contracts. In addition to a lot of bad contracts they have a bunch of nmc's. They have to cut cap.

I just think it seems like he should be one of the last guys they move. Trade someone like Anisimov if you have to, even Crawford.

[CasperX22]

I have no idea why Chicago would move Hjammer. Making 4 mil? Absolute steal. For a team with cap issues, trading top pair dmen making 4mil just doesn't seem like a smart move.

Bc guys like Seabrook have immovable contracts. In addition to a lot of bad contracts they have a bunch of nmc's. They have to cut cap.

I just think it seems like he should be one of the last guys they move. Trade someone like Anisimov if you have to, even Crawford.

Anisimov has a NMC. So does Crawford. Plus they are weak down the middle and in goal behind them. 1. You aren't likely to get much for either. And 2. Trading either one would put them in a really bad spot. They really don't have much of value that they can move.