Buds Board Keepers League

To PHX:
Brooks Laich


To TBL:
Cody Hodgson

Yup confirmed

wut

if there ever was a trade that should be veto'd this is it

I like it for Nick, but it's not even close to veto worthy.

^^ how is this not close to veto worthy? what possible motivation is there to move hodgson for laich, nevermind the production, if phx just wanted to add salary I could see it I guess, but that makes no sense still as hodgson will make on this contract close to what laich is making currently

Monk wroteCOLON^^ how is this not close to veto worthy? what possible motivation is there to move hodgson for laich, nevermind the production, if phx just wanted to add salary I could see it I guess, but that makes no sense still as hodgson will make on this contract close to what laich is making currently

Look at the periphs and offensive production, there isn't a very wide gap between the two.

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Monk wroteCOLON^^ how is this not close to veto worthy? what possible motivation is there to move hodgson for laich, nevermind the production, if phx just wanted to add salary I could see it I guess, but that makes no sense still as hodgson will make on this contract close to what laich is making currently

Look at the periphs and offensive production, there isn't a very wide gap between the two.

exactly his point...

Hodgson's age + potential + value in BBKL + what a rebuilding team needs = bad deal for phx

gooker wroteCOLON

MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON

Monk wroteCOLON^^ how is this not close to veto worthy? what possible motivation is there to move hodgson for laich, nevermind the production, if phx just wanted to add salary I could see it I guess, but that makes no sense still as hodgson will make on this contract close to what laich is making currently

Look at the periphs and offensive production, there isn't a very wide gap between the two.

exactly his point...

Hodgson's age + potential + value in BBKL + what a rebuilding team needs = bad deal for phx

No Paul, Luke's point was that this trade is veto worthy. That is a far cry from what you are saying.

Am I the only one that thinks this is a home run for ennzie? A year ago, no chance anyone moves Laich for Hodgson. I'd never make this trade if I was Nick. Similar salary for worse stats imo. I actually txt Facey and told him he was crazy to take this deal. Laich is an h2h monster who had one injury prone year, this league is way to what have you done for me lately lol. Laich isn't Bergeron or Kesler but he is definitely in the tier below for complete h2h centers.

Don't see how this is close to veto worthy lol

Laich is being underrated from this injured season.

Shep wroteCOLONLaich is being underrated from this injured season.

no kidding. last year they would have called it veto worthy in the opposite direction.

shooker wroteCOLON

Shep wroteCOLONLaich is being underrated from this injured season.

no kidding. last year they would have called it veto worthy in the opposite direction.

no you wouldnt, not after hodgson's rookie year.. i said its veto worthy and i still think so, but its not like it matters because whether its right or wrong we dont use veto. I just think its an atrocious trade especially considering what all phx has on his team

Monk wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLON

Shep wroteCOLONLaich is being underrated from this injured season.

no kidding. last year they would have called it veto worthy in the opposite direction.

no you wouldnt, not after hodgson's rookie year.. i said its veto worthy and i still think so, but its not like it matters because whether its right or wrong we dont use veto. I just think its an atrocious trade especially considering what all phx has on his team

yes I would lol. I said as much to nick via txt before this was posted. I would not be opposed to him posting any of my txt to prove my sincerity lol. Not that there is any point in that lol. Just saying, Yes, I honestly feel this is a horrible deal for facey lol.

shooker wroteCOLON

Monk wroteCOLON

shooker wroteCOLON

Shep wroteCOLONLaich is being underrated from this injured season.

no kidding. last year they would have called it veto worthy in the opposite direction.

no you wouldnt, not after hodgson's rookie year.. i said its veto worthy and i still think so, but its not like it matters because whether its right or wrong we dont use veto. I just think its an atrocious trade especially considering what all phx has on his team

yes I would lol. I said as much to nick via txt before this was posted. I would not be opposed to him posting any of my txt to prove my sincerity lol. Not that there is any point in that lol. Just saying, Yes, I honestly feel this is a horrible deal for facey lol.

Gonna agree with Bryan here, easy trade to make for ennize. I guess it shows that BBKL is all what have you done for me now.

Didn't think it would be veto worthy - was a very hard trade for me to make, considered it or several days and had better value offers on laich. I'm a long time coho fan, and made this deal hoping he signs cheap.

Nick wroteCOLONDidn't think it would be veto worthy - was a very hard trade for me to make, considered it or several days and had better value offers on laich. I'm a long time coho fan, and made this deal hoping he signs cheap.

I'd say he's around 4 ish

Im not a hodgson fan.

I am a Laich fan.

this is a deal where both teams lose

cliff11 wroteCOLON

Nick wroteCOLONDidn't think it would be veto worthy - was a very hard trade for me to make, considered it or several days and had better value offers on laich. I'm a long time coho fan, and made this deal hoping he signs cheap.

I'd say he's around 4 ish

I think so too, I also expect Kadri to be in the 3.75-4M range.