Buds Board Keepers League

To Dallas:
Brent Burns
Dany Heatley

To San Jose:
Alex Edler
David Booth
Anton Lander

Confirmed.

Not a fan of this deal but saves me a lot of cap.

woop woop finally reached the cap floor woop woop

Just generic 2nd?

Mike wroteCOLONJust generic 2nd?

yup haha http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=6890

Like this for pete

pretty fair deal IMO

not a huge fan of heater, but maybe he'll regain that scoring with parise and koivu

Peter wroteCOLON

Mike wroteCOLONJust generic 2nd?

yup haha http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=6890

Kind of a pain in the ass for bookkeeping

Shouldnt that pick be in the background, like a gentlemens deal? I say that because there is no way to track it like Mike mentioned. Someone owing someone else a pick is not a tradeable asset that can safely be kept track of? can it?

mr. bruin wroteCOLONShouldnt that pick be in the background, like a gentlemens deal? I say that because there is no way to track it like Mike mentioned. Someone owing someone else a pick is not a tradeable asset that can safely be kept track of? can it?

It couldve been but i thought i might as well post it in the trade

I know they have been traded before but if anyone has a problem I am sure we can rework this

It really should be a "gentleman's" pick. Not up to us to keep track of that.

Good deal boys. Win/win.

DAL wins

Peter wroteCOLON

mr. bruin wroteCOLONShouldnt that pick be in the background, like a gentlemens deal? I say that because there is no way to track it like Mike mentioned. Someone owing someone else a pick is not a tradeable asset that can safely be kept track of? can it?

It couldve been but i thought i might as well post it in the trade

I threw a note on my draft records of this deal...I trust that you and Nick do what you need to do to make this square.

that's huge!

However, it needs some rewording at least:

-cannot trade assets you don't own
-cannot trade assets potentially owed ( involved) in a condition..

http://bbkl.ca/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6165#p78253

Is it really a conditional thing when Nick owes a 2nd Rounder regardless? I'm not a fan of these deals involving "futures" but technically, it falls outside those words. It's on Nick to pay up his bet so that deal can be completed.

Shoalzie wroteCOLONIs it really a conditional thing when Nick owes a 2nd Rounder regardless? I'm not a fan of these deals involving "futures" but technically, it falls outside those words. It's on Nick to pay up his bet so that deal can be completed.

again:

-cannot trade assets you don't own
-cannot trade assets potentially owed (involved) in a condition..

these rules have been added for a reason.. i don't think we should go back and re-thinking the whole thing each time, just to remember which exactly all those reasons were..

anyway, relying on bet picks was (and would still be) wrong cause it would create problems any time a GM quits the league.. you don't want to charge a new GMs for bets he never made just because the outcoming picks were part of a deal.

Besides, the league is not in charge of the control over bet picks so iirc (it's been a long time eh, damn lockout) we don't take for granted that those will be indeed paid.

The 2nd rounder owed 'by Nick' should not be posted and is a gentleman's agreement for it to be settled.

If need be I'll take it out of the title

Shep wroteCOLONThe 2nd rounder owed 'by Nick' should not be posted and is a gentleman's agreement for it to be settled.

For book-keeping sake, I need to know where these picks are coming from so we don't have the old routine of a handful of picks each year go unclaimed because not every pick is accounted for.