Page 1 of 2

PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:36 am
by Robin Hood
To Calgary

Zack Phillips

To Pittsburgh


Theo Peckham

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:37 am
by Sensfanjosh
Confirmed.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:34 pm
by kimmer
This deal smells so bad

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:34 pm
by Robin Hood
gooker wroteCOLONThis deal smells so bad
?

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:28 pm
by kimmer
I just don't like it

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:01 pm
by bills09
I personally think Shiv could of done better, I offered Chris Butler for the same deal.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:14 pm
by Robin Hood
I'm a huge Peckham fan. Beaast h2h. And I think he will find a way to get back to what he was. Also only 24.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:29 pm
by Shep
SuperMario wroteCOLONI'm a huge Peckham fan. Beaast h2h. And I think he will find a way to get back to what he was. Also only 24.
7th dman at best.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:46 pm
by Nick
too shitty fort the nhl.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:15 pm
by MSP4LYFE
You like Theo Peckham better than Matt Carkner? Really...

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:16 pm
by Robin Hood
MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou like Theo Peckham better than Matt Carkner? Really...
Really.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:28 pm
by MSP4LYFE
SuperMario wroteCOLON
MSP4LYFE wroteCOLONYou like Theo Peckham better than Matt Carkner? Really...
Really.
I don't see it... They are the same type of defenceman, only difference is that Carkner is going to have alot of opportunity on a shallow Islanders blueline. Peckham was the 7th defenceman in EDM last season, and they have since acquired Justin Schultz. Not to mention that: Colten Teubert, Martin Marincin, David Musil, Martin Gernat and Oscar Klefbom are one year older, and one step closer to the NHL.

Carkner's contract and term also lead to me to believe that the Islanders have a plan for him. Whereas Peckham's one year pact provides more uncertainty.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:46 pm
by Nick
Carkner is way better then Peckham - he can actually play position, at least a little, and clearly takes pride in standing up for his teammates.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:12 pm
by thom54
Hey... Carkner must have taken pride in all those punches his face took from Orr.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:40 pm
by Robin Hood
Peckham >>> carkner in bbkl

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:35 pm
by MSP4LYFE
SuperMario wroteCOLONPeckham >>> carkner in bbkl
He was better in the past due to playing on an inferior club, which lead to more ice time. The roles have reversed now, expect Carkner to have a very productive BBKL season.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:55 pm
by Robin Hood
MSP4LYFE wroteCOLON
SuperMario wroteCOLONPeckham >>> carkner in bbkl
He was better in the past due to playing on an inferior club, which lead to more ice time. The roles have reversed now, expect Carkner to have a very productive BBKL season.
This is a pretty subjective statement. You have no statistical grounds to believe Carkner will kill it ---> just that he may be given the ice - which also I doubt the Isles see him as anything more than a 6th D that will step in in games vs opponents with a fighter. Meanwhile, I know Peckham took a step back. But given the ridiculous numbers a year ago there are higher "odds" of him putting up solid h2h numbers than Carkner suddenly becoming a better player than he is. This is of course my opinion. But regardless, I don't own Peckham anymore. Let's talk about how good Hejduk is ;).

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:12 pm
by The BBKL Insider
i'd take Carkner over Peckham everyday of the week; in both the BBKL and NHL.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:14 pm
by Nick
Peckham had good numbers and was god awful. So bad that he barely got the play the next year.

Re: PIT/CGY

PostedCOLON Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:23 am
by MSP4LYFE
SuperMario wroteCOLONThis is a pretty subjective statement. You have no statistical grounds to believe Carkner will kill it ---> just that he may be given the ice - which also I doubt the Isles see him as anything more than a 6th D that will step in in games vs opponents with a fighter.
There is nothing subjective about projecting an increase in production with more ice time, and a bigger role. Furthermore, I did not say that Carkner would kill it, a little bit of reading comprehension would go a long way, Shiv.
SuperMario wroteCOLONMeanwhile, I know Peckham took a step back. But given the ridiculous numbers a year ago there are higher "odds" of him putting up solid h2h numbers than Carkner suddenly becoming a better player than he is. This is of course my opinion. But regardless, I don't own Peckham anymore. Let's talk about how good Hejduk is ;).
When Peckham plays he is a productive H2H asset. However, Theo Peckham is a terrible player in real life, and that impacts his ability to get in the lineup consistently, and in turn produce. I'm not sure if you are deliberately ignoring that fact, or simply don't watch the Oilers play regularly.