Page 1 of 1

PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:31 am
by Robin Hood
To San Jose

Tyler Bozak
David Booth

To Pittsburgh

Mike Ribeiro

Awesome talks, Shook.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:34 am
by shooker
Confirmed. Ribeiro will light it up in WSH but slowly gaining some depth here

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:38 am
by kimmer
This is not that good of a depth, IMO

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 am
by Nick
Solid trade I think.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:55 am
by shooker
gooker wroteCOLONThis is not that good of a depth, IMO
pheww. for a second there I forgot I dont value your opinion. I was a little hurt there for a moment.

FTR I offered at least three GM's two for ones similar to this where I was actually getting less value and they turned it down. So imo this was a pretty good deal when taking all my previous discussions into consideration.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:19 pm
by Shep
Once the JVR @ Centre experiment fails, Bozak will once again be playing between Kessel and Lupul again, surely to hit 50pts.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:25 pm
by shooker
Shep wroteCOLONOnce the JVR @ Centre experiment fails, Bozak will once again be playing between Kessel and Lupul again, surely to hit 50pts.
Bingo. That experiment could even fail in preseaon or practice. The guy is a natural winger, it might be clear from the get go that it isn't going to work. Even if it does, that just means more short handed time while still landing some pp and hitting 30-40 points. Im still ok with that.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:19 pm
by kimmer
shooker wroteCOLON
gooker wroteCOLONThis is not that good of a depth, IMO
pheww. for a second there I forgot I dont value your opinion. I was a little hurt there for a moment.

FTR I offered at least three GM's two for ones similar to this where I was actually getting less value and they turned it down. So imo this was a pretty good deal when taking all my previous discussions into consideration.
Actually you know what, you are the one that took the most offence to this haha... you're quite a lot snappier than I thought lol putting up a whole line to tell me that you don't value my opinion lol

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:59 pm
by shooker
gooker wroteCOLON
shooker wroteCOLON
gooker wroteCOLONThis is not that good of a depth, IMO
pheww. for a second there I forgot I dont value your opinion. I was a little hurt there for a moment.

FTR I offered at least three GM's two for ones similar to this where I was actually getting less value and they turned it down. So imo this was a pretty good deal when taking all my previous discussions into consideration.
Actually you know what, you are the one that took the most offence to this haha... you're quite a lot snappier than I thought lol putting up a whole line to tell me that you don't value my opinion lol
Im just a better troller. I wasn't snapping at all lol.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:24 pm
by tyler
Trolly-train. HOws your hangover bry.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:27 pm
by shooker
bergey wroteCOLONTrolly-train. HOws your hangover bry.
back on the meds lol. I shouldn't have drank on the meds. aweful night haha.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:52 pm
by The BBKL Insider
the JVR experiment will not fail, you losers

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:25 pm
by shooker
Fair Deals Steve wroteCOLONthe JVR experiment will not fail, you losers
yea as him playing winger in Phi worked so well, he is a sure thing at C. I'd have more faith with Kessel at C tbh, at least he played C at higher levels.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:30 pm
by Robin Hood
shooker wroteCOLON
Fair Deals Steve wroteCOLONthe JVR experiment will not fail, you losers
yea as him playing winger in Phi worked so well, he is a sure thing at C. I'd have more faith with Kessel at C tbh, at least he played C at higher levels.
+1

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:38 pm
by The BBKL Insider
SuperMario wroteCOLON
shooker wroteCOLON
Fair Deals Steve wroteCOLONthe JVR experiment will not fail, you losers
yea as him playing winger in Phi worked so well, he is a sure thing at C. I'd have more faith with Kessel at C tbh, at least he played C at higher levels.
+1
-1

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:39 pm
by The BBKL Insider
Fair Deals Steve wroteCOLON
SuperMario wroteCOLON
shooker wroteCOLON
Fair Deals Steve wroteCOLONthe JVR experiment will not fail, you losers
yea as him playing winger in Phi worked so well, he is a sure thing at C. I'd have more faith with Kessel at C tbh, at least he played C at higher levels.
+1
-1
= 0



Losers

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:24 pm
by Nick
JvR played C at the same level Phil did... Both were NCAA centres, but after his draft year James switched to the wing.

Anyways, skill set is there, position can be taught. There is very little harm in trying it, weirdest thing is how much attention it's being given, guys like Kane, Kane, Skinner, Benn, Sharp, Marleau, Jussi, all switch positions throughout their career. Stamkos was basically a W until this past year.Hell Burns went from C to D, Red Kelly did the opposite.

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:32 pm
by The BBKL Insider
Nick knows

Re: PIT/SJS Easy Peasy

PostedCOLON Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:49 pm
by Robin Hood
No one said there is any harm in trying it. But this is a classic case of trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. In fact, I bet this is Burke and Randy positioning for other trades. JvR will roll with Grabo. Lupul Bozak and Kessel, unless we get you know, an actual C.