Buds Board Keepers League

Campbell Conference:
1. Edmonton Oilers (North leader)
2. Arizona Coyotes (West leader)
3. Toronto Maple Leafs
4. Calgary Flames
5. Vancouver Canucks
6. LA Kings
7. St Louis Blues
8. San Jose Sharks
---------------------------
9. Anaheim Ducks
10. Colorado Avalanche
11. Minnesota Wild
12. Ottawa Senators
13. Vegas Golden Knights
14. Winnipeg Jets
15. Montreal Canadiens

Prince of Wales Conference:
1. Buffalo Sabres (East leader)
2. Dallas Stars (Central leader)
3. Washington Capitals
4. Nashville Predators
5. Tampa Bay Lightning
6. New Jersey Devils
7. Pittsburgh Penguins
8. Boston Bruins
--------------------------
9. Florida Panthers
10. Columbus Blue Jackets
11. Philadelphia Flyers
12. Carolina Hurricanes
13. New York Rangers
14. Detroit Red Wings
15. Chicago Black Hawks
16. New York Islanders

Still early in the season with lots of movement.

I'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Matthew wroteCOLONI'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Like Ty Smith?

Matthew wroteCOLONI'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Don’t worry I was never going to trade him to you anyways lol

Kid had one of the all time great 18 year old seasons for a rookie dman. I’m sure he will be fine despite his early struggles this year

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLONI'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Like Ty Smith?

No...

Like makar/heiskanen/hughes

44 in 82 as an 18 year old rookie
40 in 59 his sophomore season (55 point pace)

Struggled out the gate this year but now you and many others out there are apparently ready to dismiss him. Come on now lol. Has he lived up to the “generational” tag? Not so far, but his first two seasons have been pretty outstanding. Maybe don’t use an 8 or 9 game sample size next time

Idk why I took the bait, but whatever lol

Matthew wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLONI'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Like Ty Smith?

No...

Like makar/heiskanen/hughes

So these guys are generational?

KapG wroteCOLON44 in 82 as an 18 year old rookie
40 in 59 his sophomore season (55 point pace)

Struggled out the gate this year but now you and many others out there are apparently ready to dismiss him. Come on now lol. Has he lived up to the “generational” tag? Not so far, but his first two seasons have been pretty outstanding. Maybe don’t use an 8 or 9 game sample size next time

Idk why I took the bait, but whatever lol

Not just based on points. A guy like heiskanen I think is way ahead defensively. And Makars advanced stats say he is too.

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLON

CasperX22 wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLONI'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Like Ty Smith?

No...

Like makar/heiskanen/hughes

So these guys are generational?

I never said that. I'm saying that dahlin doesn't appear to be ahead of them by any means, and thus a generational tag seems a bit far reaching now, for dahlin.

Matthew wroteCOLON

KapG wroteCOLON44 in 82 as an 18 year old rookie
40 in 59 his sophomore season (55 point pace)

Struggled out the gate this year but now you and many others out there are apparently ready to dismiss him. Come on now lol. Has he lived up to the “generational” tag? Not so far, but his first two seasons have been pretty outstanding. Maybe don’t use an 8 or 9 game sample size next time

Idk why I took the bait, but whatever lol

Not just based on points. A guy like heiskanen I think is way ahead defensively. And Makars advanced stats say he is too.

I would say both Heiskanen and Makar play on much better run and talented teams as well which needs to be a consideration.

I'll take Dahlen

KapG wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLONI'm starting to feel like Rasmus Dahlin won't be "generational". I know he's only just turning 21, but there is a crop of dmen in that same age group I think I'd take over him now and moving forward.

Don’t worry I was never going to trade him to you anyways lol

Kid had one of the all time great 18 year old seasons for a rookie dman. I’m sure he will be fine despite his early struggles this year

Great player but still thrilled you didn’t take Svech 1st overall.

Fun year tracking all these teams picks I own

Fun being tied for 5th in the league standings and also tied for 3rd in the division.

1st in the West division would be 5th in the North division. Lol...

Matthew wroteCOLON Prince of Wales Conference:
1. Buffalo Sabres (East leader)
2. Dallas Stars (Central leader)
3. Washington Capitals
4. Nashville Predators
5. Tampa Bay Lightning
6. New Jersey Devils
7. Pittsburgh Penguins
8. Boston Bruins
--------------------------
9. Florida Panthers
10. Columbus Blue Jackets
11. Philadelphia Flyers
12. Carolina Hurricanes
13. New York Rangers
14. Detroit Red Wings
15. Chicago Black Hawks
16. New York Islanders

Bunch of losers. No Picks. No Hope. What's the point...

I think I'm done

Tony wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLON Prince of Wales Conference:
1. Buffalo Sabres (East leader)
2. Dallas Stars (Central leader)
3. Washington Capitals
4. Nashville Predators
5. Tampa Bay Lightning
6. New Jersey Devils
7. Pittsburgh Penguins
8. Boston Bruins
--------------------------
9. Florida Panthers
10. Columbus Blue Jackets
11. Philadelphia Flyers
12. Carolina Hurricanes
13. New York Rangers
14. Detroit Red Wings
15. Chicago Black Hawks
16. New York Islanders

Bunch of losers. No Picks. No Hope. What's the point...

I think I'm done

It's a really rough year for sports, I'm not sure that its a reflection of how good/bad many teams are. It's also so early in our season.

Tony wroteCOLON

Matthew wroteCOLON Prince of Wales Conference:
1. Buffalo Sabres (East leader)
2. Dallas Stars (Central leader)
3. Washington Capitals
4. Nashville Predators
5. Tampa Bay Lightning
6. New Jersey Devils
7. Pittsburgh Penguins
8. Boston Bruins
--------------------------
9. Florida Panthers
10. Columbus Blue Jackets
11. Philadelphia Flyers
12. Carolina Hurricanes
13. New York Rangers
14. Detroit Red Wings
15. Chicago Black Hawks
16. New York Islanders

Bunch of losers. No Picks. No Hope. What's the point...

I think I'm done

It looks like you have a bunch of Vegas, Carolina and sis players...So you are playing each week way behind most of your opponents in gp. Those will probably be made up later in the season and you will get the gp advantage and surge a bit.

Like Josh said, it's a weird year. Arizona is beating LA in the bbkl West division.

Da Stuetzle is in da house!

man 14 goals already in a week where my four opponents have combined for a total of 6 goals so far, what a waste

oh, and I'm managing to lose GWG in the process