New Positional Change Protocol - Effective Immediately.
PostedCOLON Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:49 am
The CC has ruled in favour effective immediately the following way to shift players to a non-friendly CBS position:
in the case of a CC member or a normal GM
- pm all 3 admin's (Raptactics/Starpainter/Mashley93) with at least 2 sources of positional proof (more will improve your case) for the player(s) you're requesting to change.
- the sources must be legit. i.e; yahoo, tsn, sportsnet, THN, CBS, nhl.com, even things coaches say about their players in the media will be considered, past game proof of position.
- please also provide some feedback as to why the players are deserving of the switch.
- you need 2 of the 3 admins to approve these switches.
in the case of an admin
- pm all the reamining 2 admin's & the head of the CC (mr. bruin) with at least 2 sources of positional proof (more will improve your case) for the player(s) you're requesting to change.
- the sources must be legit. i.e; yahoo, tsn, sportsnet, THN, CBS, nhl.com, even things coaches say about their players in the media will be considered, past game proof of position.
- please also provide some feedback as to why the players are deserving of the switch.
- you need 2 of the 3 to approve these switches.
Example for what we're looking for:
in the case of a CC member or a normal GM
- pm all 3 admin's (Raptactics/Starpainter/Mashley93) with at least 2 sources of positional proof (more will improve your case) for the player(s) you're requesting to change.
- the sources must be legit. i.e; yahoo, tsn, sportsnet, THN, CBS, nhl.com, even things coaches say about their players in the media will be considered, past game proof of position.
- please also provide some feedback as to why the players are deserving of the switch.
- you need 2 of the 3 admins to approve these switches.
in the case of an admin
- pm all the reamining 2 admin's & the head of the CC (mr. bruin) with at least 2 sources of positional proof (more will improve your case) for the player(s) you're requesting to change.
- the sources must be legit. i.e; yahoo, tsn, sportsnet, THN, CBS, nhl.com, even things coaches say about their players in the media will be considered, past game proof of position.
- please also provide some feedback as to why the players are deserving of the switch.
- you need 2 of the 3 to approve these switches.
Example for what we're looking for:
Tomas Fleischmann winger eligibility proof: I'll submit 3 for good measure!
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=3081
http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/nhl/players/3176
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/play ... leischmann
Plus Flash did not even have 200 FOWs last season.
Brooks Laich winger eligibility proof: I'll submit 3 for good measure!
http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/nhl/players/3287
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/players/Brooks_Laich
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=2553
Plus, Laich did not even have 200 FOWs last season.
Brandon Dubinsky winger eligibility proof:
http://forecaster.thehockeynews.com/hoc ... r.cgi?4407
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=4407
Plus Dubinsky played a lot of wing last season and Tortorella has said LW is his best position and should play there a lot this season, and every single person on HFboards has Dubinsky on the wing in here roster outlooks:
http://fantasysports.usatoday.com/conte ... HL&id=2205 <--- Tortorella prefers Dubinsky as a LWer
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/4706 ... g-position <--- 2nd paragraph shows Dubinsky played LW
http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=821610 <--- Dubinsky played LW in this game