Buds Board Keepers League

Yea, shame on me for asking someone to make the original FOR discussion open to the public so we can clearly see a condensed version of the *logic* used to glean this out. Simple question. Didn't realize that requesting it was tiresome and out of my place.

I'm quitting. Since I'm out of my place for requesting anything related to the policies in this league to be made public, I suppose I'm not really a member of this league after all. Good luck.

I see our "Fuck Derrick Brassard" campaign is coming along nicely.

Chris wroteCOLONYea, shame on me for asking someone to make the original FOR discussion open to the public so we can clearly see a condensed version of the *logic* used to glean this out. Simple question. Didn't realize that requesting it was tiresome and out of my place.

I'm quitting. Since I'm out of my place for requesting anything related to the policies in this league to be made public, I suppose I'm not really a member of this league after all. Good luck.

Cool roster for next week, bro.

Kezia wroteCOLON

Chris wroteCOLONYea, shame on me for asking someone to make the original FOR discussion open to the public so we can clearly see a condensed version of the *logic* used to glean this out. Simple question. Didn't realize that requesting it was tiresome and out of my place.

I'm quitting. Since I'm out of my place for requesting anything related to the policies in this league to be made public, I suppose I'm not really a member of this league after all. Good luck.

Cool roster for next week, bro.

No different from your team all year, Lee.

And Nick, for the record, you've not once used any form of logic or numbers with me when I requested a detailed reasoning for using the algorithm to determine positional eligibility. I've read through every posts, every move, and even asked around about it: all have given roughly the same pensive answer: "I don't really know how they came up with it" followed up with a firm statement declaring their dislike of the policy.

So go fuck yourself. If I'm out of my place, you're out of yours for assuming you're above the issue. Asshole.

Chris wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLON

Chris wroteCOLONYea, shame on me for asking someone to make the original FOR discussion open to the public so we can clearly see a condensed version of the *logic* used to glean this out. Simple question. Didn't realize that requesting it was tiresome and out of my place.

I'm quitting. Since I'm out of my place for requesting anything related to the policies in this league to be made public, I suppose I'm not really a member of this league after all. Good luck.

Cool roster for next week, bro.

No different from your team all year, Lee.

And Nick, for the record, you've not once used any form of logic or numbers with me when I requested a detailed reasoning for using the algorithm to determine positional eligibility. I've read through every posts, every move, and even asked around about it: all have given roughly the same pensive answer: "I don't really know how they came up with it" followed up with a firm statement declaring their dislike of the policy.

So go fuck yourself. If I'm out of my place, you're out of yours for assuming you're above the issue. Asshole.

I took over a lump of shit. What's your excuse for making a playoff contender into a lump of shit?

Kezia wroteCOLON

Chris wroteCOLON

Kezia wroteCOLON

Chris wroteCOLONYea, shame on me for asking someone to make the original FOR discussion open to the public so we can clearly see a condensed version of the *logic* used to glean this out. Simple question. Didn't realize that requesting it was tiresome and out of my place.

I'm quitting. Since I'm out of my place for requesting anything related to the policies in this league to be made public, I suppose I'm not really a member of this league after all. Good luck.

Cool roster for next week, bro.

No different from your team all year, Lee.

And Nick, for the record, you've not once used any form of logic or numbers with me when I requested a detailed reasoning for using the algorithm to determine positional eligibility. I've read through every posts, every move, and even asked around about it: all have given roughly the same pensive answer: "I don't really know how they came up with it" followed up with a firm statement declaring their dislike of the policy.

So go fuck yourself. If I'm out of my place, you're out of yours for assuming you're above the issue. Asshole.

I took over a lump of shit. What's your excuse for making a playoff contender into a lump of shit?

Same GM who didn't waste a 2nd overall pick on Pavelec.

I never had any intentions of that pick being 2nd overall when i traded it. And it wasn't a 2nd overall when I reacquired it. It's called smart asset management.

Let's not let that get in the way of how awesome Rick DiPietro and Al Montoya are, though.

Kezia wroteCOLONLet's not let that get in the way of how awesome Rick DiPietro and Al Montoya are, though.

Pavelec: 3.03 GAA - .905sv%
Montoya: 2.43 GAA - .918sv%

k.

11 more GP, 5 more wins on a team 1 point out of a playoff spot with no offense and a 2 and a half year age difference

vs

5 wins total on a team 2nd last in the conference

Kezia wroteCOLON11 more GP, 5 more wins on a team 1 point out of a playoff spot with no offense and a 2 and a half year age difference

vs

5 wins total on a team 2nd last in the conference

So we can conclude that Pavelec isn't the reason for any success the Jets have had this year. Gotcha.

..That is seriously your argument?

3.03GAA + .905sv% was my argument. Apparently you don't know when to quit.

OH HEY I MADE A FUNNY.

Cam Ward is terrible.

lol

Kezia wroteCOLONCam Ward is terrible.

Hey - leave my guys out of this

Cody McCormick from C to W

27 GP

Last season FOR = .356

This Season FOR = .031

Faceoffs Taken =7
Time on Ice = 221

Florida Chris wroteCOLONCody McCormick from C to W

27 GP

Last season FOR = .356

This Season FOR = .031

Faceoffs Taken =7
Time on Ice = 221

Is this good to go? Can someone make the switch befor roster lock

Not an admin/ not able to change positional listings-> but it is good.