Re: Trade - NYI/FLA
PostedCOLON Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:26 pm
u guys talking about brent burns?!
LOLgooker wroteCOLONu guys talking about brent burns?!
LOL I hope Paul never trades him. Burns is becoming the next Bruno Gervais in terms of a bbkl joke lol. Love it, miss those days.hong57 wroteCOLONLOLgooker wroteCOLONu guys talking about brent burns?!
Nope you're fine. Grabner alone > Erat. If I were you I'd create a similar package as you did for Horcoff for Erat though.Tony wroteCOLONSo I trade a borderline 60 point guy who is 6 years younger for him ... and add a first round pick for good measure?
Am I the only one missing somethinf here? Seriously, if I am someone tell me.
Lol Bro burns wud be ur best player on ur teamArian wroteCOLONburns for a conditional 7th. condition is that he becomes good.
gooker wroteCOLONLol Bro burns wud be ur best player on ur teamArian wroteCOLONburns for a conditional 7th. condition is that he becomes good.
LOLgooker wroteCOLONLol Bro burns wud be ur best player on ur teamArian wroteCOLONburns for a conditional 7th. condition is that he becomes good.
gooker wroteCOLONLol Bro burns wud be ur best player on ur teamArian wroteCOLONburns for a conditional 7th. condition is that he becomes good.
no you wouldn't. you also wouldn't take burns over ribeiro lol, I know I wouldn't.Big Fun wroteCOLONI'd take burns over the sisters
Why do people believe things like this? Torts has no reason to use the Sedins ont he PK. It exposes them to injury risk and they have no experience.Nick wroteCOLONPotentially with torts running them on the PK they could be epic bbklers
SuperMario wroteCOLONWhy do people believe things like this? Torts has no reason to use the Sedins ont he PK. It exposes them to injury risk and they have no experience.Nick wroteCOLONPotentially with torts running them on the PK they could be epic bbklers
i did not say 100% they are... but denying the possibility, with the head coach saying otherwise, means you two either have ties straight into the locker room, or figure you know more than Torts does about how he is going to run the team.New Canucks head coach John Tortorella promised changes at his first media conference on Tuesday, but the one that jumped out like a Roman candle was his promise to use the Sedins on the penalty kill.
they actually do have experience and the desire to do so. Back in the Naslund days, the Sedins played a lot more pk time. They also pk'd in the SEL as rookies and in the following seasons. They have wanted to do it for the past few years but AV wouldn't let them and quite frankly we didn't need them to. With our lack of quality depth at the C position there is a good chance the Sedins are used. Torts has also said on multiple occasions that he would try them out. 1 of them being at the annual season ticket holders dinner that happened two weeks ago if you desire proof lol. People forget how reliable they are defensively. They aren't selke noms or anything but they are always the line out there with a minute left. They have really only choked once, unfortunately that was in this years playoffs. I'd be surprised if they weren't at minimum pk 3 this year,. I expect 45 secs to a minute per game minimum.SuperMario wroteCOLONWhy do people believe things like this? Torts has no reason to use the Sedins ont he PK. It exposes them to injury risk and they have no experience.Nick wroteCOLONPotentially with torts running them on the PK they could be epic bbklers
lol beat me to it nick.Nick wroteCOLONBecause he said he'd try them there... and they've PK-ed in the past (although not recently)....
i did not say 100% they are... but denying the possibility, with the head coach saying otherwise, means you two either have ties straight into the locker room, or figure you know more than Torts does about how he is going to run the team.New Canucks head coach John Tortorella promised changes at his first media conference on Tuesday, but the one that jumped out like a Roman candle was his promise to use the Sedins on the penalty kill.