The Ultimate Fantasy Hockey Experience
http://bbkl.ca/
I said the same thing when he offered me Filatov + 4 1sts for Nielsen last year. Ridiculous value win for you Berg!bergey wroteCOLONI'll hate this trade till the day I die but how do you say no to that offer.
+/-, Hits, Pims, SOG, STPTS are also significantly lower...SuperMario wroteCOLONBtw fun fact. Laich's numbers from last year:
41 Points, 120 Hits, 202 SHTOI, 664 FOW, 192 SOG, 92 BLOCKS
He puts up about 10 less points than the following players but he is just as good in every other category. And what I paid for Laich is a BARGAIN for any of the names below.
Dustin Brown
David Backes
Ryan Callahan
Backes is definitely a tier above. That being said Laich puts up more SHTOI and Blocks. Laich's numbers vs. Brown/Callahan (who are treated as BBKL Gods) are retardedly close if not better. My main point was that any of those 3 players would have cost significantly more as Laich is a severely undervalued player in BBKL despite being in that conversation.Shep wroteCOLON+/-, Hits, Pims, SOG, STPTS are also significantly lower...SuperMario wroteCOLONBtw fun fact. Laich's numbers from last year:
41 Points, 120 Hits, 202 SHTOI, 664 FOW, 192 SOG, 92 BLOCKS
He puts up about 10 less points than the following players but he is just as good in every other category. And what I paid for Laich is a BARGAIN for any of the names below.
Dustin Brown
David Backes
Ryan Callahan
Exactly, which is why you shouldn't have been able to get your hands on him. As an owner of one of those three, you are correct in your assumptions and you got a good one on a great buy.SuperMario wroteCOLONBackes is definitely a tier above. That being said Laich puts up more SHTOI and Blocks. Laich's numbers vs. Brown/Callahan (who are treated as BBKL Gods) are retardedly close if not better. My main point was that any of those 3 players would have cost significantly more as Laich is a severely undervalued player in BBKL despite being in that conversation.Shep wroteCOLON+/-, Hits, Pims, SOG, STPTS are also significantly lower...SuperMario wroteCOLONBtw fun fact. Laich's numbers from last year:
41 Points, 120 Hits, 202 SHTOI, 664 FOW, 192 SOG, 92 BLOCKS
He puts up about 10 less points than the following players but he is just as good in every other category. And what I paid for Laich is a BARGAIN for any of the names below.
Dustin Brown
David Backes
Ryan Callahan
You are insane. I crushed that deal. It is now Laich + Bozak for Neal + Brouwer. I would do that deal all day every day. 2 Cs for 2 Ws and an h2h stud to boot. Neal scores. That is all he does. And will he repeat last year? It's a big question. Meanwhile Laich is a guarantee to be a BBKL stud.shooker wroteCOLONI don't think people have a problem with shiv's end in this deal per say. it is more so reactionary from how bad the Neal deal was the other day. People are using that one to judge this trade.
don't call me insane dude. my comment was directed as a general statement more so than how I view the trade. geez man no need to get so defensive all the time, don't treat me like Mik. Also, just because I would rather Neal + Brouwer than Laich + Bozo does not make me wrong. I feel a lot of people in here would choose that side, especially with Laich's groin injury. With his style of play, that could hurt him all year long.SuperMario wroteCOLONYou are insane. I crushed that deal. It is now Laich + Bozak for Neal + Brouwer. I would do that deal all day every day. 2 Cs for 2 Ws and an h2h stud to boot. Neal scores. That is all he does. And will he repeat last year? It's a big question. Meanwhile Laich is a guarantee to be a BBKL stud.shooker wroteCOLONI don't think people have a problem with shiv's end in this deal per say. it is more so reactionary from how bad the Neal deal was the other day. People are using that one to judge this trade.
LOL you repeatedly call my trade terrible - then you want me to not defend it?shooker wroteCOLONdon't call me insane dude. my comment was directed as a general statement more so than how I view the trade. geez man no need to get so defensive all the time, don't treat me like Mik. Also, just because I would rather Neal + Brouwer than Laich + Bozo does not make me wrong. I feel a lot of people in here would choose that side, especially with Laich's groin injury. With his style of play, that could hurt him all year long.SuperMario wroteCOLONYou are insane. I crushed that deal. It is now Laich + Bozak for Neal + Brouwer. I would do that deal all day every day. 2 Cs for 2 Ws and an h2h stud to boot. Neal scores. That is all he does. And will he repeat last year? It's a big question. Meanwhile Laich is a guarantee to be a BBKL stud.shooker wroteCOLONI don't think people have a problem with shiv's end in this deal per say. it is more so reactionary from how bad the Neal deal was the other day. People are using that one to judge this trade.
Neal > Laich + Brouwer > Bozak imoshooker wroteCOLONdon't call me insane dude. my comment was directed as a general statement more so than how I view the trade. geez man no need to get so defensive all the time, don't treat me like Mik. Also, just because I would rather Neal + Brouwer than Laich + Bozo does not make me wrong. I feel a lot of people in here would choose that side, especially with Laich's groin injury. With his style of play, that could hurt him all year long.SuperMario wroteCOLONYou are insane. I crushed that deal. It is now Laich + Bozak for Neal + Brouwer. I would do that deal all day every day. 2 Cs for 2 Ws and an h2h stud to boot. Neal scores. That is all he does. And will he repeat last year? It's a big question. Meanwhile Laich is a guarantee to be a BBKL stud.shooker wroteCOLONI don't think people have a problem with shiv's end in this deal per say. it is more so reactionary from how bad the Neal deal was the other day. People are using that one to judge this trade.
Laich > Neal. Bozak > Brouwer to me. Matter of preference. But that's how I see it.Peter wroteCOLONNeal > Laich + Brouwer > Bozak imoshooker wroteCOLONdon't call me insane dude. my comment was directed as a general statement more so than how I view the trade. geez man no need to get so defensive all the time, don't treat me like Mik. Also, just because I would rather Neal + Brouwer than Laich + Bozo does not make me wrong. I feel a lot of people in here would choose that side, especially with Laich's groin injury. With his style of play, that could hurt him all year long.SuperMario wroteCOLONYou are insane. I crushed that deal. It is now Laich + Bozak for Neal + Brouwer. I would do that deal all day every day. 2 Cs for 2 Ws and an h2h stud to boot. Neal scores. That is all he does. And will he repeat last year? It's a big question. Meanwhile Laich is a guarantee to be a BBKL stud.shooker wroteCOLONI don't think people have a problem with shiv's end in this deal per say. it is more so reactionary from how bad the Neal deal was the other day. People are using that one to judge this trade.
If you attack a trade/a player that I have acquired, you better believe that I will challenge you to defend your stance. It's not personal.shooker wroteCOLONIn this thread, I say "how" to gookers genius comment then say a general statement in summation of while people dislike this trade. It was the trade with ANA I have an issue with.... I said only this so I do not understand why you need to attack. You bash my trades too and I defend not attack the people that disagree.
End.
i.e.:shooker wroteCOLON don't call me insane dude. my comment was directed as a general statement more so than how I view the trade. geez man no need to get so defensive all the time, don't treat me like Mik.
dont worry mikkyuss wroteCOLONi.e.:shooker wroteCOLON don't call me insane dude. my comment was directed as a general statement more so than how I view the trade. geez man no need to get so defensive all the time, don't treat me like Mik.
1. don't treat me as bad as you treat Mik (meh)
2. don't treat me like Mik does (bad?!)
3. don't treat me as if i was attacking you like Mik does (uh?)
4. don't treat me as if i was insane like Mik (proud!)
plenty of options here, anyone care to give me the odds?
i agree with this statementPeter wroteCOLON Neal > Laich
Brouwer > Bozak