Buds Board Keepers League

Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWhat about the third seed being gone after week 1?

you could easily knock him out, and to be honest, i dont see any upsets in the west, strictly because teams are so even...if 7 beats 2 it's because they are even matched...same goes for 1 and 8, as well as 3 and 6.

Ha, just joking around, can't see an outcome where I knock Shep out. I'll likely still be missing a lot of guys, and I'd need to be healthy to keep it close. Shep has a very under rated team.

Time for Rinne to lay shit down! Good Luck Boston Kyle

All yal'll bitches count your lucky starts I didn't make make it.

thom54 wroteCOLONTime for Rinne to lay shit down! Good Luck Boston Kyle

You too bud. Not liking Rinne with 5 games. What I am liking is that 3 of those 5 are against Chicago. You have a scary team and this should go down to the wire. Not happy that I lose Thompson for 2 games(suspended)

Lee wroteCOLONAll yal'll bitches count your lucky starts I didn't make make it.

Yea. I think you are right on this one. Your team thumped me.

Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONWhat about the third seed being gone after week 1?

It's a lock.

Just a heads up that the tie breaker for MTL/NYR is in flux - I'm remaining removed from comment obviously, but thought I should relay that its of concern.

Nick wroteCOLONJust a heads up that the tie breaker for MTL/NYR is in flux - I'm remaining removed from comment obviously, but thought I should relay that its of concern.

First tie-breaker is Wins (NHL standard); in which I had 3 more. 2nd tie-breaker is h2h and we didnt play.

Chuck Norris wroteCOLON

Nick wroteCOLONJust a heads up that the tie breaker for MTL/NYR is in flux - I'm remaining removed from comment obviously, but thought I should relay that its of concern.

First tie-breaker is Wins (NHL standard)

NHL standard is W-L of games, that's why in the CC we went with W-L of matchups (not of stats).
But it was not announced, hence the current uncertainty.

kyuss wroteCOLON

Chuck Norris wroteCOLON

Nick wroteCOLONJust a heads up that the tie breaker for MTL/NYR is in flux - I'm remaining removed from comment obviously, but thought I should relay that its of concern.

First tie-breaker is Wins (NHL standard)

NHL standard is W-L of games, that's why in the CC we went with W-L of matchups (not of stats).
But it was not announced, hence the current uncertainty.

To my knowledge the first tie breaker has always been overall # of wins...even back when the NHL had ties. I fail to see any confusion.

what resembles NHL tie breaker is for us overall # of matchups-W, not # of stats W.

That's part of the reasons that led to the change for this season, which however was never announced.

Hopefully this was clearer.

From Chuck:

You need to announce rule changes for tie-breakers in the offseason

That's from chuck, he asked me to post it, he isn't near a computer, and to be honest, i have no idea what he's talking about, i havent been following this tie-breaker stuff.

Theres not going to be any rule changes mid-season without proper league announcements. We have never done that and never will. There is some confusion because there was a topic in CC that brought this same subject up and nothing was ever finalized or announced.

the way the rule is currently being read, "is wins in a week" rather than " number of weeks won " - both are wins - even amongst CC was some confusion. Got voted on but no one is sure if announcement was made (as in no one made one)/where current rule is.

in any case, the CC chief spoke, argument settled as far as this season goes!

Matchups input to CBS...

Updated ... Looks like nick only won the division because of washington's inability to keep a legal roster. Those points cost HUGE, i love that.

9th in the East again this year ... I think that's three in a row

Tony wroteCOLON9th in the East again this year ... I think that's three in a row

Maple Leafs?????