Buds Board Keepers League

Tl;dr

bills09 wroteCOLONTl;dr

my thoughts exactly

I have no idea what that means.

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONI have no idea what that means.

Too long didn't read

I never read anything more than 3 sentences on here.

http://www.halifaxmooseheads.ca/article ... mooseheads

a little leaf and moosehead news

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONhttp://www.halifaxmooseheads.ca/article ... mooseheads

a little leaf and moosehead news

I thought you didn't read things longer than 3 sentences...

Chuck Norris wroteCOLON

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONhttp://www.halifaxmooseheads.ca/article ... mooseheads

a little leaf and moosehead news

I thought you didn't read things longer than 3 sentences...

not on here, but a real article i will

Just heard on fan590 that Arizona is committing to strome. Anyone else hear that? Hanifin vs marner for the boys?

Then looks like this makes me appear smart

#provedSteveWrong
#bbklShouldListenToMyPlugAss

i suspected that after reading some stuff about the combine.

Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONJust heard on fan590 that Arizona is committing to strome. Anyone else hear that? Hanifin vs marner for the boys?

either or, Franchise dman vs electric winger.

For all of you Rick Nash lovers

Per Bob McKenzie via Nichols on Hockey

http://www.todaysslapshot.com/from-t...re-nash-trade/

Quote:
“And I just floated it out there (on Thursday’s Insider Trading, yet to air as of his radio hit) that I would not be surprised if they at least had to consider the notion of what would Rick Nash would fetch in a trade. He’s got a $7.9 million cap hit. He’s got three years left on his deal. Those are never easy trades to make. And for the same reason that the Rangers might want to get cap space, you’re also potentially giving up a 42-goal scorer.
Quote:
Not saying that it’ll happen. But saying that I’ll bet you dollars to donuts that it will get discussed.

“It’s interesting and a point of order on Nash himself is he has a full no-move clause right now. So he’s in the driver’s seat. Except the full no-move clause expires on June 30 this year. On July 1, he’s now subject to a modified no-trade where I believe there’s 10-12 teams that he has approved or will approve to go to.

“So it does give the Rangers a lot more flexibility after June 30, if they decide that that’s something they want to pursue.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=257&v=by8qsq-cplE[/youtube]

Bruyns wroteCOLONAfter hearing the news I assumed they would be bringing in Keefe for the Marlies. Checked my twitter and that seems to be the general consensus, but nothing official yet.

Official now

Bruyns wroteCOLON

Bruyns wroteCOLONAfter hearing the news I assumed they would be bringing in Keefe for the Marlies. Checked my twitter and that seems to be the general consensus, but nothing official yet.

Official now

Yep it's official. Sad to see my Greyhounds lose their coach, but glad it is to the Marlies.

Yep, we had him here in Pembroke, with great success.

So are the marlies going to run an identical system to that which Babcock is going to employ? I've heard whispers of this being the case and think it would really help our younger guys when they transition up to the big club.

KapG wroteCOLONSo are the marlies going to run an identical system to that which Babcock is going to employ? I've heard whispers of this being the case and think it would really help our younger guys when they transition up to the big club.

they seemed to do that in Detroit. it's why they were okay promoting Jeff Blasmail

i think it's an excellent way to develop the kids.

Both coaches are big on puck possession so it's a possibility