True, but I mean really that could happen with a lot of teams. He's currently on pace for about the same amount of wins he's had in the last 4-5 years and a similar save percentage. It's not like the Rangers haven't been bad and relying on him to bail them out for a whileHandsome&FairMike wroteCOLONPeople will always bite if the price is right. Issue is NYR may not be as good as they typically were going forward so the wins category may not be where it usually is...
Why not? It would be an upgrade lol!thom54 wroteCOLONlol i was never giving you Bishop for Markstrom
What upgrade would that be?CasperX22 wroteCOLONWhy not? It would be an upgrade lol!thom54 wroteCOLONlol i was never giving you Bishop for Markstrom
And that's where Dallas went wrong. Expecting Bishop to be significantly better than what they already had. Still haven't learned their lesson.kimmer wroteCOLONit really would've been
i mean
vancouver is a shit team but nobody expected these kinda numbers from their goalies, who are actually saving their faces in relation to their standings (dismal difference in GAA and SV% btwn bishop/markstrom and only 7 wins difference lol)
not to mention its crazy how vancouver who are just 6 games behind .500 is second last in conference, where in the east, a team 5 games above .500 can get a WC2 spot lolll
dallas on the other hand, who are loaded and brought in bishop in hopes to securing at least a top 2 spot in their division through GOALTENDING help, barely sucking penis for pennies to stay alive in the WC spot
really a reverse effect on what these respective teams wanted out of their goalie use lol
Yes we are.Loki wroteCOLONI'm not a big fan of Bishop but are we looking at the same numbers? Bishop is a .918 this year and Markstrom is a .910
