Who?kimmer wroteCOLONAntonio Beaullivier
expansion draft
- timwebb1212
- PostsCOLON 720
- JoinedCOLON Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: expansion draft
Re: expansion draft
Shoalzie wroteCOLONkoomzzz wroteCOLONare our rules for this somewhat finalized? do contracts matter for our exposure requirements or just games played in the previous season or 2?
We're honoring the 40/70 exposure rule and we're using the exempt list from CapFriendly. The only things we're not acknowledging is NMC or long term injuries.
Any player that isn't under contract this season (rookie or veteran) is exempt from the draft.
In short, the only players eligible for the draft are any players under contract (for this season) that don't fall under the 1st/2nd year pro rule. (See CapFriendly for the exempt list).
pretty much this I believe.
Re: expansion draft
ehm, from the announcement:dave1959 wroteCOLONShoalzie wroteCOLONkoomzzz wroteCOLONare our rules for this somewhat finalized? do contracts matter for our exposure requirements or just games played in the previous season or 2?
We're honoring the 40/70 exposure rule and we're using the exempt list from CapFriendly. The only things we're not acknowledging is NMC or long term injuries.
Any player that isn't under contract this season (rookie or veteran) is exempt from the draft.
In short, the only players eligible for the draft are any players under contract (for this season) that don't fall under the 1st/2nd year pro rule. (See CapFriendly for the exempt list).
pretty much this I believe.
"BBKL will be following the NHL rules for who is eligible and exempt with the exception of UFAs needing protection in our league"
-
- PostsCOLON 4043
- JoinedCOLON Sun Nov 06, 2011 5:09 pm
Re: expansion draft
Can you click it for me Dave?
Re: expansion draft
Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONCan you click it for me Dave?
done
Re: expansion draft
+1Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONCan you click it for me Dave?
Re: expansion draft
Thank you for the links and info.
So Can i assume from this statement:
First & Second Year Pros
All players who have accrued two or less professional seasons at the end of the 2016-17 season, as well as all unsigned draft choices appearing on the teams reserve list, will be exempt from the upcoming expansion draft.
That, if i have a player who entered the league in 15-16 season and at the end of 16-17 season will have played approx 100 games, that i do not need to expose this player?
So Can i assume from this statement:
First & Second Year Pros
All players who have accrued two or less professional seasons at the end of the 2016-17 season, as well as all unsigned draft choices appearing on the teams reserve list, will be exempt from the upcoming expansion draft.
That, if i have a player who entered the league in 15-16 season and at the end of 16-17 season will have played approx 100 games, that i do not need to expose this player?
Re: expansion draft
Go to cap friendly. look at their status. If you dispute their status, post here.
- lightupdadarkness
- PostsCOLON 4881
- JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: expansion draft
Can we dispute a players status?Lee wroteCOLONGo to cap friendly. look at their status. If you dispute their status, post here.
Re: expansion draft
The player you are talking about has played 4 professional seasons (AHL + NHL) and thus has to be protected.CAM wroteCOLONThank you for the links and info.
So Can i assume from this statement:
First & Second Year Pros
All players who have accrued two or less professional seasons at the end of the 2016-17 season, as well as all unsigned draft choices appearing on the teams reserve list, will be exempt from the upcoming expansion draft.
That, if i have a player who entered the league in 15-16 season and at the end of 16-17 season will have played approx 100 games, that i do not need to expose this player?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: expansion draft
I don't see why not? If something we've posted contradicts cap friendly, tell us why. Scott has also added a page on your roster spreadsheet to tell you who is eligible and who is not. If there is a dispute, post here, tell us why.
Re: expansion draft
OK. AHL counts. got it. I hate expansion. Might as well just toss my picks in garbage.Matthew wroteCOLONThe player you are talking about has played 4 professional seasons (AHL + NHL) and thus has to be protected.CAM wroteCOLONThank you for the links and info.
So Can i assume from this statement:
First & Second Year Pros
All players who have accrued two or less professional seasons at the end of the 2016-17 season, as well as all unsigned draft choices appearing on the teams reserve list, will be exempt from the upcoming expansion draft.
That, if i have a player who entered the league in 15-16 season and at the end of 16-17 season will have played approx 100 games, that i do not need to expose this player?
Re: expansion draft
What a sad protection list.kimmer wroteCOLONForwards:
Matt Stajan
Andreas Athanasiou
Jason Chimera
Marcus Foligno
Carl Hagelin
Melker Karlsson
Tyler Pitlick
Defense:
Joel Edmundson
Mark Streit
Simon Despres
Goalie:
Kari Lehtonen
Notable Exemptions:
Ben Hutton
Antonio Beaullivier
Morgan Klimchuk
Filip Ahl
Kieffer Bellows
Travis Dermott
Re: expansion draft
Everyone is going to lose someone. It's not like you are the only one that is going to lose a valuable piece.CAM wroteCOLONOK. AHL counts. got it. I hate expansion. Might as well just toss my picks in garbage.Matthew wroteCOLONThe player you are talking about has played 4 professional seasons (AHL + NHL) and thus has to be protected.CAM wroteCOLONThank you for the links and info.
So Can i assume from this statement:
First & Second Year Pros
All players who have accrued two or less professional seasons at the end of the 2016-17 season, as well as all unsigned draft choices appearing on the teams reserve list, will be exempt from the upcoming expansion draft.
That, if i have a player who entered the league in 15-16 season and at the end of 16-17 season will have played approx 100 games, that i do not need to expose this player?
Re: expansion draft
Just gonna hit teams with few prospects or teams struggling to meet gp harder than others. I'm okay with losing a player though. I think this process is kinda fun.CasperX22 wroteCOLONEveryone is going to lose someone. It's not like you are the only one that is going to lose a valuable piece.CAM wroteCOLONOK. AHL counts. got it. I hate expansion. Might as well just toss my picks in garbage.Matthew wroteCOLONThe player you are talking about has played 4 professional seasons (AHL + NHL) and thus has to be protected.CAM wroteCOLONThank you for the links and info.
So Can i assume from this statement:
First & Second Year Pros
All players who have accrued two or less professional seasons at the end of the 2016-17 season, as well as all unsigned draft choices appearing on the teams reserve list, will be exempt from the upcoming expansion draft.
That, if i have a player who entered the league in 15-16 season and at the end of 16-17 season will have played approx 100 games, that i do not need to expose this player?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
Re: expansion draft
In theory teams struggling to make gp should have some prospects close to making the jump in a year where more prospects should make the jump than normal. The teams that are going to be hurt the most are teams with old rosters and not much in the pipeline.
- The BBKL Insider
- PostsCOLON 22628
- JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
- LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: expansion draft
This sounds like Tony, Billy, and Cam.CasperX22 wroteCOLONIn theory teams struggling to make gp should have some prospects close to making the jump in a year where more prospects should make the jump than normal. The teams that are going to be hurt the most are teams with old rosters and not much in the pipeline.
Everyone else should be fine.
Re: expansion draft
Thanks Lee and I don't expect many disputes since cap friendly should be accurate, but who knows what could come up.Lee wroteCOLONGo to cap friendly. look at their status. If you dispute their status, post here.