Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Bruyns » Fri May 19, 2017 9:45 pm

My bad was available at one point.

Same with Ritchie Josh made a few smart changes imo
User avatar
Bruyns
 
Posts: 4895
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 9:47 pm

Sensfanjosh wrote:Protected Johns that was why Dillon was available.

That's right, I think he was the pick before that.
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:04 pm

Who is left after anaheim?
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:06 pm

Columbus
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:10 pm

Oh. Blah. Annoyed I'm losing bernier but I suppose he isn't worth much...maybe an early 2nd or later 2nd + 3rd.

And I traded orpik for baertschi + bernier, so he is worth about 1/3rd of a 36 year old dman.

Still, would have been nice to have high gp sources, even tho I would never play him.
May have been better for tim to take goalies from people who only have 2 goalies so he could sell them back for a premium as those people become desperate. He took all three of his goalies from gms who had 3 goalies so we don't need to trade to get them back. Bad strategy.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:17 pm

I'm gonna need two goalies so I'm not concerned with my ability to extort GMs in need of a backup since only Stolarz will I trade without a goalie coming back
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:18 pm

Oh, in that case should have taken better goalies :P
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:20 pm

"Other considerations: brown"

He was protected.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:22 pm

Matthew wrote:Oh, in that case should have taken better goalies :P

I'll concede I didn't do the best job managing the goalie options. IMO that was my biggest mistake. But it didn't work out too bad.

Luongo would've been a good option since Zona didn't expose shit for skaters
Raanta might've been a better option than Halak/Bernier, especially if Vegas takes him. Ward also is not super valuable
And I should've got more for not taking Grubauer or I should've taken him. Undersold on that one.


Other than goalies though I'm very happy with my draft.
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:23 pm

Matthew wrote:"Other considerations: brown"

He was protected.

JT Brown? I thought he was exposed? Or at least he was listed as such a little before the lock, I knew I was taking a goalie from you for a long while in advance, so I honestly didn't check.
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:25 pm

True. You did pretty good. I believe if you can contract some of your extra pieces into a few high end pieces you can do pretty well this season!
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:26 pm

timwebb1212 wrote:
Matthew wrote:"Other considerations: brown"

He was protected.

JT Brown? I thought he was exposed? Or at least he was listed as such a little before the lock, I knew I was taking a goalie from you for a long while in advance, so I honestly didn't check.


I ended up protecting him and making wennberg available. You should have checked.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:27 pm

Matthew wrote:
timwebb1212 wrote:
Matthew wrote:"Other considerations: brown"

He was protected.

JT Brown? I thought he was exposed? Or at least he was listed as such a little before the lock, I knew I was taking a goalie from you for a long while in advance, so I honestly didn't check.


I ended up protecting him and making wennberg available. You should have checked.

lol shucks, blew that one I guess
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby hong57 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:27 pm

fantraxed you hjmarrssonn
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
 
Posts: 6080
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby Matthew » Fri May 19, 2017 10:28 pm

Hah. I just switched brown and noesen.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7293
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:28 pm

hong57 wrote:fantraxed you hjmarrssonn

my man
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:29 pm

Matthew wrote:Hah. I just switched brown and noesen.

Haha yeah didn't really have interest in any of the guys you exposed. Prince was maybe the top skater option I guess?
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby hong57 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:29 pm

i was hoping tim take hammer ... i don't wanna lose ferland as i have chabot coming up and due to cap reasons.. but hammer is a very very very very very solid bbkler and in real nhler too.. and not old by any means..
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
 
Posts: 6080
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby hong57 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:30 pm

and i duno if tim really seriously considered armia.. but armia is a very good piece too tbh and he was given some shtoi this year
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
 
Posts: 6080
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Expansion Draft Discussion and Speculation

Postby timwebb1212 » Fri May 19, 2017 10:31 pm

I'll go ahead and put up the final pick so we can end this trade freeze
User avatar
timwebb1212
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Expansion Draft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest