Mock Draft

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Handsome&FairMike » Tue May 16, 2017 8:32 am

Loki wrote:
kimmer wrote:Lol
Loki
Antoine vermette over martin hanzal
Haha


Lol I missed him, that's what I get for doing it quickly. Will Hanzal even play 50 games a year though?

Edit: Seems I took Vatanen instead of Hanzal


Ya I don't think you're wrong going with either vatanen or hanzal. Maybe better health when he's on a team where he isn't relied on to do everything
User avatar
Handsome&FairMike
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Mock Draft

Postby kimmer » Tue May 16, 2017 8:40 am

Hanzal still more bbkl impact over overrated vatanen
2017-2018 Transactions
CAR Google Sheet

- A true liberator of the apprehensive voice -
User avatar
kimmer
 
Posts: 15642
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
Location: Markham, Ontario

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Bruyns » Tue May 16, 2017 8:41 am

Handsome&FairMike wrote:
Loki wrote:
kimmer wrote:Lol
Loki
Antoine vermette over martin hanzal
Haha


Lol I missed him, that's what I get for doing it quickly. Will Hanzal even play 50 games a year though?

Edit: Seems I took Vatanen instead of Hanzal


Ya I don't think you're wrong going with either vatanen or hanzal. Maybe better health when he's on a team where he isn't relied on to do everything


I'd likely go Hanzal mainly due to not having great C options, but Wilson has a lot of value too.
User avatar
Bruyns
 
Posts: 4728
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Matthew » Tue May 16, 2017 8:42 am

If Wilson can ever break out offensively and be a 30 point winger, with how many periphs he gets he would be a monster
Matthew
 
Posts: 7022
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Matthew » Tue May 16, 2017 8:44 am

Trade me wilson.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7022
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby thom54 » Tue May 16, 2017 10:31 am

lol. Stop licking your chops over my Willy
User avatar
thom54
 
Posts: 5478
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:00 pm
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Loki » Tue May 16, 2017 3:54 pm

kimmer wrote:Hanzal still more bbkl impact over overrated vatanen


Yeah I'd probably pick him if I did it over again, didn't do a second pass before submitting :lol:
User avatar
Loki
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:38 pm
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Re: Mock Draft

Postby The BBKL Insider » Tue May 16, 2017 4:10 pm

Loki wrote:
kimmer wrote:Lol
Loki
Antoine vermette over martin hanzal
Haha


Lol I missed him, that's what I get for doing it quickly. Will Hanzal even play 50 games a year though?

Edit: Seems I took Vatanen instead of Hanzal


You're Mock draft is pretty bad Loki lol
i feel like you may need an advisor haha

;)
Image
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
 
Posts: 20981
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Loki » Tue May 16, 2017 4:23 pm

The BBKL Insider wrote:You're Mock draft is pretty bad Loki lol
i feel like you may need an advisor haha

;)


Haha, our drafts are like 90% the same :lol:
User avatar
Loki
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:38 pm
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Re: Mock Draft

Postby The BBKL Insider » Tue May 16, 2017 5:35 pm

Loki wrote:
The BBKL Insider wrote:You're Mock draft is pretty bad Loki lol
i feel like you may need an advisor haha

;)


Haha, our drafts are like 90% the same :lol:

that 10% is big! it's the difference between a good team and meh team!
Image
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
 
Posts: 20981
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Loki » Tue May 16, 2017 6:06 pm

I'll admit I did very little research into the mock compared to what I'd do if I were really drafting, kinda just went from the hip mostly. That said I'm curious which picks we differed on so I'll do a comparison later today and see if I can justify going the way that that I did or if I really just messed up. :lol:
User avatar
Loki
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:38 pm
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Loki » Tue May 16, 2017 7:41 pm

So I had a look at the differences between our lists out of curiosity, it seems largely I went for youth and guys who were waiver exempt. If I hadn't missed Hanzal in WSH's list I would probably have picked him instead of Vatanen. Here's the comparison of differences otherwise.

Forwards:
Trevor Lewis - Chi
Matt Beleskey - Col
Carl Soderberg - Fla
Dustin Brown - Pit
vs
Greg McKegg
Brock McGinn
Antoine Vermette
Hunter Shinkaruk
Austin Watson
Sven Andrighetto
Zack Kassian

Defence
Kevin Miller - Bos
Derrick Pouliot - Buf
Brenden Dillon - Cgy
Chris Wideman - Clb
Mirco Mueller - Min
Alexander Edler - Van
vs
Colin Miller
David Schlemko
Niklas Hjalmarsson
Dmitry Orlov

Goalies
Jonathan Bernier - Ana
Jacob Markstrom - Mon
vs
Jimmy Howard
Thomas Greiss

I can see why you went with some of your picks, but mostly it looks like my mind was set on younger guys

Looks like we were about 36% different in the end :lol:
User avatar
Loki
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:38 pm
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Handsome&FairMike » Tue May 16, 2017 9:15 pm

Alrighty - re-did mine. Interesting cause it changed quite a bit on reassessment.

And yes steve, it is a better team than yours.

Bernier (ANA)
Rattie (ARZ)
Kevan Miller (BOS)
Gudbranson (BUF)
Vermette (CGY)
Despres (CAR)
Lewis (CHI)
Beleskey (COL)
Watson (CBJ)
Aberg (DAL)
Sbisa (DET)
Sheahan (EDM)
Soderberg (FLA)
Edmundson (LA)
Hjalmarsson (MIN)
Orlov (MON)
Arvidsson (NSH)
Ward (NJ)
Manning (NYI)
Kruger (NYR)
Carrick (OTT)
Boedker (PHI)
Brown (PIT)
Stolarz (SJS)
Johnson (STL)
Oshie (TB)
Tatar (TOR)
Edler (VAN)
Hanzal (WSH)
Smith (WPG)

Arvidsson - Hanzal – Oshie
Boedker - Soderberg – Tatar
Smith - Vermette - Brown
Lewis – Kruger – Ward
Beleskey - Watson – Sheahan- Rattie - Aberg

Edler – Edmundson
Orlov - Hjalmarsson
Manning – Gudbrandson
Sbisa - Miller
Despres - Carrick

Johnson
Bernier
Stolarz
User avatar
Handsome&FairMike
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Mock Draft

Postby hong57 » Tue May 16, 2017 9:17 pm

i don't know 95% of the nhler and i only know those on my team.. sorry i can't possibly do a decent mock one luckily im not in Tim's shoes
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
 
Posts: 5937
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Matthew » Tue May 16, 2017 9:31 pm

Handsome&FairMike wrote:Alrighty - re-did mine. Interesting cause it changed quite a bit on reassessment.

And yes steve, it is a better team than yours.

Bernier (ANA)
Rattie (ARZ)
Kevan Miller (BOS)
Gudbranson (BUF)
Vermette (CGY)
Despres (CAR)
Lewis (CHI)
Beleskey (COL)
Watson (CBJ)
Aberg (DAL)
Sbisa (DET)
Sheahan (EDM)
Soderberg (FLA)
Edmundson (LA)
Hjalmarsson (MIN)
Orlov (MON)
Arvidsson (NSH)
Ward (NJ)
Manning (NYI)
Kruger (NYR)
Carrick (OTT)
Boedker (PHI)
Brown (PIT)
Stolarz (SJS)
Johnson (STL)
Oshie (TB)
Tatar (TOR)
Edler (VAN)
Hanzal (WSH)
Smith (WPG)

Arvidsson - Hanzal – Oshie
Boedker - Soderberg – Tatar
Smith - Vermette - Brown
Lewis – Kruger – Ward
Beleskey - Watson – Sheahan- Rattie - Aberg

Edler – Edmundson
Orlov - Hjalmarsson
Manning – Gudbrandson
Sbisa - Miller
Despres - Carrick

Johnson
Bernier
Stolarz


I like the forwards for this team. The defense and goaltending is meh.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7022
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Handsome&FairMike » Tue May 16, 2017 9:40 pm

goaltending is definite weak point but I think the Defense is solid. Good mix of young and vets; better periphs than scoring. If it makes you happier trade vatanen or Greiss for Hanzal.
User avatar
Handsome&FairMike
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Mock Draft

Postby hong57 » Tue May 16, 2017 9:44 pm

hanzal is good 3C but no better imo on a good team.. i'd take a potential starter
Image
#91 - John Tavares
User avatar
hong57
 
Posts: 5937
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Matthew » Tue May 16, 2017 9:45 pm

Is Howard gonna get the lions share of games in Detroit again this season? Mrazek didn't do so well last season.

Another option could be taking both elliott and Johnson and ending up with an 1A and 1B goalie for the same NHL team (calgary). And then a 3rd young prospect goalie w starter upside. That way he locks in 82 gp.
Matthew
 
Posts: 7022
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby CasperX22 » Tue May 16, 2017 9:54 pm

Handsome&FairMike wrote:Alrighty - re-did mine. Interesting cause it changed quite a bit on reassessment.

And yes steve, it is a better team than yours.

Bernier (ANA)
Rattie (ARZ)
Kevan Miller (BOS)
Gudbranson (BUF)
Vermette (CGY)
Despres (CAR)
Lewis (CHI)
Beleskey (COL)
Watson (CBJ)
Aberg (DAL)
Sbisa (DET)
Sheahan (EDM)
Soderberg (FLA)
Edmundson (LA)
Hjalmarsson (MIN)
Orlov (MON)
Arvidsson (NSH)
Ward (NJ)
Manning (NYI)
Kruger (NYR)
Carrick (OTT)
Boedker (PHI)
Brown (PIT)
Stolarz (SJS)
Johnson (STL)
Oshie (TB)
Tatar (TOR)
Edler (VAN)
Hanzal (WSH)
Smith (WPG)

Arvidsson - Hanzal – Oshie
Boedker - Soderberg – Tatar
Smith - Vermette - Brown
Lewis – Kruger – Ward
Beleskey - Watson – Sheahan- Rattie - Aberg

Edler – Edmundson
Orlov - Hjalmarsson
Manning – Gudbrandson
Sbisa - Miller
Despres - Carrick

Johnson
Bernier
Stolarz


Manning, really? Like other mock as well that forward group is pretty bad. Surely Tony has better assets available than Manning as well. Goaltending is also pretty weak with 3 likely backups.
User avatar
CasperX22
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: Mock Draft

Postby Handsome&FairMike » Tue May 16, 2017 9:58 pm

Matthew wrote:Is Howard gonna get the lions share of games in Detroit again this season? Mrazek didn't do so well last season.

Another option could be taking both elliott and Johnson and ending up with an 1A and 1B goalie for the same NHL team (calgary). And then a 3rd young prospect goalie w starter upside. That way he locks in 82 gp.


Ya Howard is another good option... I'd say between him and Johnson... just thought Brown offered more value vs whatever was left from whoever own's johnson's team.
User avatar
Handsome&FairMike
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:41 am
Location: Toronto, ON

PreviousNext

Return to Expansion Draft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest