Page 12 of 12

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 2:01 pm
by kimmer
Ya i deleted
Cuz casper told me what u wanted from him
Forget it moving on

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 2:14 pm
by dave1959
.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 2:38 pm
by Matthew
I think stolarz would be an elite pickup for tim.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 2:54 pm
by foofnik
kimmer wrote:Ya i deleted
Cuz casper told me what u wanted from him
Forget it moving on

Casper asked for more than Stolarz

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 2:54 pm
by kimmer
K then answer PM

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 2:56 pm
by foofnik
Matthew wrote:I think stolarz would be an elite pickup for tim.

There's at least 10 teams with better goalies out there to take than a potential backup. And Tim is limited to 3. He'd be shooting himself in the foot by taking Stolarz.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:06 pm
by CasperX22
foofnik wrote:
Matthew wrote:I think stolarz would be an elite pickup for tim.

There's at least 10 teams with better goalies out there to take than a potential backup. And Tim is limited to 3. He'd be shooting himself in the foot by taking Stolarz.


It also depends on what teams have. Like Mik for instance, but why would Tim waste his time with his goalies when he is likely to get a really good player from Mik?

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:09 pm
by foofnik
Well yeah, some of them it obviously makes more sense to take a skater instead. But there's still a ton more teams with goalies I would take ahead of Stolarz. If that's what Tim wants to do, go for it, I have Mrazek regardless. But I think he wastes value if he does.

If he had no limit on goalies it would be a different story. But with a limit of 3, Stolarz is a waste of a roster spot for him.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:13 pm
by CasperX22
foofnik wrote:Well yeah, some of them it obviously makes more sense to take a skater instead. But there's still a ton more teams with goalies I would take ahead of Stolarz. If that's what Tim wants to do, go for it, I have Mrazek regardless. But I think he wastes value if he does.

If he had no limit on goalies it would be a different story. But with a limit of 3, Stolarz is a waste of a roster spot for him.


Or he could just take him as his goalie of the future. The options out there for him are mostly older stop gap starters at best, so there is at least some logic behind taking 2 veteran NHL goalies and taking a stash with his 3rd goalie. Also depends what else you are exposing which I admittedly haven't even looked into seeing what you are exposing.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:23 pm
by foofnik
If you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.

If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:31 pm
by thom54
foofnik wrote:If you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.

If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.



pretty much . A late first ain't much vs a goalie

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:51 pm
by CasperX22
thom54 wrote:
foofnik wrote:If you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.

If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.



pretty much . A late first ain't much vs a goalie


I guess not when people stupidly pay 1sts for backup goalies.

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 3:56 pm
by thom54
CasperX22 wrote:
thom54 wrote:
foofnik wrote:If you want goalie of the future you're grabbing a Pickard, Raanta, Korpisalo/Forsberg.

If it's who Tim wants then so be it, but I think he leaves value on the table by doing it. A late 1st next year to lose Stolarz and another piece doesn't do much for me when instead I only lose 1 piece by holding tight.



pretty much . A late first ain't much vs a goalie


I guess not when people stupidly pay 1sts for backup goalies.


agreed, standard used to be a 2nd round ish value i think for a guy like Carter Hutton (career backup,stable, etc)

Re: expansion draft

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 5:05 pm
by Matthew
Stolarz is waiver exempt for at minimum 2 more seasons. When you are taking 30 NHLers I suspect that would be extremely helpful.

Plus, as others have said, your team doesn't have great skater options available in comparison to other teams that have goalies.

Also, that guys like korpisalo/forsberg are behind Bobrovsky, while stolarz could be sharing the net with neuvirth as soon as this year.