expansion draft

BUTTON_POST_REPLY
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Matthew »

Lame.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: expansion draft

Post by The BBKL Insider »

Are we allowed to expose players that are exempt? For example, can i expose Jimmy Vesey?
Image
User avatar
dave1959
PostsCOLON 5138
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:43 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario

Re: expansion draft

Post by dave1959 »

Not during the freeze.
User avatar
Bruyns
PostsCOLON 7177
JoinedCOLON Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:18 am

Re: expansion draft

Post by Bruyns »

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLONAre we allowed to expose players that are exempt? For example, can i expose Jimmy Vesey?
No you can't choose for exempt players to be available.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Matthew »

Why not? Wouldn't it just strengthen the crop of players available to tim? He doesn't need to choose them. Just say that those players can't fill one of your mandatory 40gp spots.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
CasperX22
PostsCOLON 6136
JoinedCOLON Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:37 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by CasperX22 »

Matthew wroteCOLONWhy not? Wouldn't it just strengthen the crop of players available to tim? He doesn't need to choose them. Just say that those players can't fill one of your mandatory 40gp spots.
Then what would be the point of exposing them?
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Lee »

People just want to keep changing the rules to suit their own purposes
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: expansion draft

Post by The BBKL Insider »

i wasn't changing any rules, i was asking a question.
Image
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Matthew »

I just don't understand the advantage Steve would get from it.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Matthew »

I suppose if Steve really wanted to do it he could just trade tim the player he isn't allowed to expose and in exchange tim can't choose any of his players available with any value.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
The BBKL Insider
PostsCOLON 22628
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 8:46 pm
LocationCOLON San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: expansion draft

Post by The BBKL Insider »

Matthew wroteCOLONI suppose if Steve really wanted to do it he could just trade tim the player he isn't allowed to expose and in exchange tim can't choose any of his players available with any value.
essentially this...if Tim liked Vesey the most i could always trade him to Tim for Eakin/Savard after expansion. I was simply trying to give him another option to sway him for taking one of those 2...in the end it doesn't really matter.
Image
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Matthew »

Is there a thread where we Post all our protected pieces and unprotected pieces for submission?
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by lightupdadarkness »

Matthew wroteCOLONIs there a thread where we Post all our protected pieces and unprotected pieces for submission?
Nope using the SS by simply putting a P. Those who don't have a P and are eligible will automatically be exposed for Tim to pick from. Scotts making a list for him so if you don't put any P's on your SS all your eligible players will be exposed
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Matthew »

I know that. But I thought we might have lists here too, for those that wanted to put them here. It could be unofficial.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
lightupdadarkness
PostsCOLON 4881
JoinedCOLON Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:37 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by lightupdadarkness »

Matthew wroteCOLONI know that. But I thought we might have lists here too, for those that wanted to put them here. It could be unofficial.
If it's unofficial it wouldn't mean anything tho right? No P on SS you'd still be exposing them. Seems like it would potentially create a point of contention if someone forgets to do their SS
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: expansion draft

Post by Lee »

Incoming qq from some lazy bastids
User avatar
koomzzz
PostsCOLON 1245
JoinedCOLON Wed May 25, 2016 2:15 pm
LocationCOLON Cleveland, OH

Re: expansion draft

Post by koomzzz »

Who's best to PM for personal clarification on something, I'm not finding answers to my questions from capfriendly
User avatar
thom54
PostsCOLON 7459
JoinedCOLON Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:00 pm
LocationCOLON Kingston, ON

Re: expansion draft

Post by thom54 »

anyone of us, we all if unsure, put the question to the group too
User avatar
thom54
PostsCOLON 7459
JoinedCOLON Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:00 pm
LocationCOLON Kingston, ON

Re: expansion draft

Post by thom54 »

The BBKL Insider wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONI suppose if Steve really wanted to do it he could just trade tim the player he isn't allowed to expose and in exchange tim can't choose any of his players available with any value.
essentially this...if Tim liked Vesey the most i could always trade him to Tim for Eakin/Savard after expansion. I was simply trying to give him another option to sway him for taking one of those 2...in the end it doesn't really matter.

Functionally i do not think you can expose Vesey, but you can make the arrangement to do the swap in understanding. That would be legal/how it'll be done in NHL too
User avatar
koomzzz
PostsCOLON 1245
JoinedCOLON Wed May 25, 2016 2:15 pm
LocationCOLON Cleveland, OH

Re: expansion draft

Post by koomzzz »

thom54 wroteCOLONanyone of us, we all if unsure, put the question to the group too
Very well.

According to capfriendly I don't have any Defensemen that meet NHL exposure requirements, but I think this is due to them being upcoming UFAs.(??I think) I DO have 2 that meet 40/70 though, that's sufficient enough for exposure in bbkl? I feel like it's been answered but I'm nervous I might need to find a Dman to expose.
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to