Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Anything goes here OT stuff is OK too!
BUTTON_POST_REPLY
User avatar
Arian The Insider
PostsCOLON 7304
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:05 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Arian The Insider »

Lol
Click Oilers image below for full team roster
Image
User avatar
Shoalzie
PostsCOLON 12673
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
LocationCOLON Portland, MI
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Shoalzie »

kimmer wroteCOLONNo we wouldn't. Once every ten yrs is cool

We're at year 7 (I think)...maybe we do re-boot after year 10?

Year 8: 2016-17
Year 9: 2017-18
Year 10: 2018-19

Do the reboot in the summer of 2019? Our last drafts would be in 2018 and we play out the '18-19 season.
DETROIT RED WINGS | ROSTER | FANTRAX
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Matthew »

I'd be for continuing this same league until I'm old and grey. I find that interesting.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
Shoalzie
PostsCOLON 12673
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 7:28 pm
LocationCOLON Portland, MI
CONTACTCOLON

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Shoalzie »

Part of me wants to see this through because I've toiling away at this but part of me wants to start fresh at some point. It depends on how everyone here feels about it.

Either do it immediately or wait a few years and so every can run their teams with that thought in mind. Prospects and draft picks will become useless at some point if were are going to start over.
DETROIT RED WINGS | ROSTER | FANTRAX
User avatar
KapG
PostsCOLON 11908
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 5:46 pm
LocationCOLON Toronto (beach area)

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by KapG »

a redraft?

no thanks
User avatar
KapG
PostsCOLON 11908
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 5:46 pm
LocationCOLON Toronto (beach area)

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by KapG »

Arian The Insider wroteCOLONLol the bump in activity will only be temporary. People will still be cheap in the end and we'd be calling for another reset again.
this



there are no trades in the leasgue cause everyone is stingy as fuck, having a redraft isnt going to fucking change that.
Sensfanjosh
PostsCOLON 4043
JoinedCOLON Sun Nov 06, 2011 5:09 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Sensfanjosh »

I don't think everyone is stingy, I've had a lot of talks with GMs lately, and even though a deal hasn't come through there hasn't been a disagreement about value, more so its because the standings are mostly set and I don't want to go all in this year and not win, and other teams are rebuilding and aren't interested in vets. Scott and I's deal came together in an afternoon though and we both seem content as far as I know.
Image
User avatar
kimmer
PostsCOLON 18090
JoinedCOLON Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:25 pm
LocationCOLON Ontario, Canada

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by kimmer »

im never stingy
User avatar
kyuss
PostsCOLON 14876
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by kyuss »

Matthew wroteCOLONI'd be for continuing this same league until I'm old and grey. I find that interesting.
that's what can make this league special.. a re-boot would be the end of it (of that special interest, at least for me)
User avatar
kyuss
PostsCOLON 14876
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by kyuss »

kimmer wroteCOLONim never stingy
puppets are not supposed to be stingy, in fact :)
User avatar
KapG
PostsCOLON 11908
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 5:46 pm
LocationCOLON Toronto (beach area)

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by KapG »

Sensfanjosh wroteCOLONI don't think everyone is stingy, I've had a lot of talks with GMs lately, and even though a deal hasn't come through there hasn't been a disagreement about value, more so its because the standings are mostly set and I don't want to go all in this year and not win, and other teams are rebuilding and aren't interested in vets. Scott and I's deal came together in an afternoon though and we both seem content as far as I know.
Everyone was a bad choice of words.
User avatar
KapG
PostsCOLON 11908
JoinedCOLON Tue May 04, 2010 5:46 pm
LocationCOLON Toronto (beach area)

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by KapG »

kyuss wroteCOLON
Matthew wroteCOLONI'd be for continuing this same league until I'm old and grey. I find that interesting.
that's what can make this league special.. a re-boot would be the end of it (of that special interest, at least for me)
Yup. I tend to agree with you
Lee
PostsCOLON 16828
JoinedCOLON Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:29 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Lee »

I'm saying run a one year test along side the normal bbkl.
User avatar
Nick
PostsCOLON 16044
JoinedCOLON Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:15 am

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Nick »

Lee join ADHL for a league in infancy. NJD is open right now! Practically stock roster, holding it's own pick projecting in the #2 spot.


BBKL is what a keeper league is supposed to be. We are dealing now with our early decisions.
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Matthew »

BBDL: Bud's Board Dynasty League
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
Tony
PostsCOLON 11222
JoinedCOLON Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm
LocationCOLON Nevada

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Tony »

BITCH: Buds In The Cooch Hockey
Image
Click banner to view current roster and picks
User avatar
Matthew
PostsCOLON 13682
JoinedCOLON Wed Oct 08, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by Matthew »

I like two modifications to the new goalie game played rule:

A) The new version can't penalize teams with an NHL goalie system. It is unlikely any NHL team will ever play 6 games in a week.

B) The new rule focuses on just penalizing Wins and Shutouts. Previously, the rule focused on all 4 categories, despite sv percentage and gaa not being directly affected in an automatically positive manner by playing more games. Thus, Penalizing all 4 categories (2 of which shouldn't be penalized) was likely to cost the offender the series (his entire season).

One question: why did cc decide to remove the shutouts for the goalie with less games played, even though that may have been the first game occurring in the week?

What are the advantages vs i) removing the shutouts of the goalie with more games played, or ii) removing shutouts accrued for starts beyond 4 games played?

I'm sure this was discussed and there is a reason you went with the final decision, but was just wondering.

Thanks again for making this rule more finely tuned. Appreciated.
Last edited by 4 on Matthew, edited 0 times in total.
ANAHEIM DUCKS | FANTRAX |
User avatar
kyuss
PostsCOLON 14876
JoinedCOLON Thu May 06, 2010 12:54 pm

Re: Ongoing CBA Discussion Thread

Post by kyuss »

appreciate the positive feedback (for once lol)
BUTTON_POST_REPLY

Return to