Page 1 of 1

Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:22 pm
by Loki
Image

Career .920 goalie still playing at a high level
4 more years at $8.5m all but guaranteeing he'll be the starter for the rest of his contract
Top 10 goalie in BBKL this year

I can take lots of cap back however I'm currently up against the contract limit so as a deadline move this might be tricky to do until I clear some space in the offseason or make other moves.

Interested in futures, high upcoming picks, young impact defenceman
Open to ideas
PM me :)

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Sun Feb 11, 2018 9:46 pm
by kimmer
Shouldve made this block as soon as u joined bbkl bro
As in hes too old at this point to garner the kinda attraction of desired calibred price

Perhaps someone will bite

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Sun Feb 11, 2018 10:06 pm
by Handsome&FairMike
People will always bite if the price is right. Issue is NYR may not be as good as they typically were going forward so the wins category may not be where it usually is...

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:16 pm
by Loki
Handsome&FairMike wroteCOLONPeople will always bite if the price is right. Issue is NYR may not be as good as they typically were going forward so the wins category may not be where it usually is...
True, but I mean really that could happen with a lot of teams. He's currently on pace for about the same amount of wins he's had in the last 4-5 years and a similar save percentage. It's not like the Rangers haven't been bad and relying on him to bail them out for a while :lol:

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:14 am
by thom54
dude's a monster. I hope you don't trade him to any contender.

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:37 pm
by Handsome&FairMike
Tom you should make a deal to shed yourself of bishop

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:48 pm
by thom54
haha why would I do that? I mean i'm sure i'd have to add onto him to get Darling or someone lol

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:50 pm
by Da_Hawks
Nah, Pekka Rinne should be the one everyone is bidding to get. Wins, sv%, he's got it all!

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:22 pm
by kimmer
All i can say is im SO glad i didnt overpay for bishop and went with markstrom...
Lehtonen when he plays, had been way more reliable of a goalie in proportion. Just expensive for a backup

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:34 pm
by thom54
lol i was never giving you Bishop for Markstrom

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:47 pm
by CasperX22
thom54 wroteCOLONlol i was never giving you Bishop for Markstrom
Why not? It would be an upgrade lol!

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:03 pm
by kimmer
it really would've been
i mean
vancouver is a shit team but nobody expected these kinda numbers from their goalies, who are actually saving their faces in relation to their standings (dismal difference in GAA and SV% btwn bishop/markstrom and only 7 wins difference lol)
not to mention its crazy how vancouver who are just 6 games behind .500 is second last in conference, where in the east, a team 5 games above .500 can get a WC2 spot lolll

dallas on the other hand, who are loaded and brought in bishop in hopes to securing at least a top 2 spot in their division through GOALTENDING help, barely sucking penis for pennies to stay alive in the WC spot

really a reverse effect on what these respective teams wanted out of their goalie use lol

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:06 pm
by thom54
CasperX22 wroteCOLON
thom54 wroteCOLONlol i was never giving you Bishop for Markstrom
Why not? It would be an upgrade lol!
What upgrade would that be?

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:07 pm
by CasperX22
kimmer wroteCOLONit really would've been
i mean
vancouver is a shit team but nobody expected these kinda numbers from their goalies, who are actually saving their faces in relation to their standings (dismal difference in GAA and SV% btwn bishop/markstrom and only 7 wins difference lol)
not to mention its crazy how vancouver who are just 6 games behind .500 is second last in conference, where in the east, a team 5 games above .500 can get a WC2 spot lolll

dallas on the other hand, who are loaded and brought in bishop in hopes to securing at least a top 2 spot in their division through GOALTENDING help, barely sucking penis for pennies to stay alive in the WC spot

really a reverse effect on what these respective teams wanted out of their goalie use lol
And that's where Dallas went wrong. Expecting Bishop to be significantly better than what they already had. Still haven't learned their lesson.

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:08 pm
by CasperX22
Truthfully though neither is any good haha.

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:11 pm
by Loki
I'm not a big fan of Bishop but are we looking at the same numbers? Bishop is a .918 this year and Markstrom is a .910

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:13 pm
by CasperX22
Loki wroteCOLONI'm not a big fan of Bishop but are we looking at the same numbers? Bishop is a .918 this year and Markstrom is a .910
Yes we are.

Re: Henrik Lundqvist

PostedCOLON Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:18 pm
by Loki
To be fair Lehtonen is also a .918 this year after a .902 last year so it's probably more the team than the goalie. Wasn't a big fan of that Bishop signing